My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/22/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council - 07/22/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:21:42 PM
Creation date
8/22/2014 3:37:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/22/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
installation and fully opaque, consisting of a wall, fence, dense vegetation, berm or <br />grade change. <br />5. A bypass lane shall be provided for each drive-thru use, allowing cars to leave the drive- <br />thru land from the stacking area. <br />6. Within the COR-2 and COR-3 subdistricts there shall be no more than one drive-thru <br />land serving a given use. <br />7. Within the COR-2b subdistrict there shall be no more than two drive-thru lands serving <br />a given use. <br />8. Within the COR-1 subdistrict, the drive-thru lane shall be located in the rear or side yard <br />only. A drive thru lane shall not be located adiacent to anv Destination Street as <br />classified in The COR Design Framework. <br />(2) Development standards. <br />(d) General development standards. All development within the COR district shall meet the COR <br />development framework that is incorporated into this chapter by reference. These standards will be <br />used by the city as the minimum requirements for evaluating development proposals and site plans. <br />However, the standards are not intended to restrict creativity in design. An applicant may request <br />modification or waiver of any standard in favor of an alternate approach that will achieve the same <br />design objective. <br />(e) Development review process within the COR district. The review process for the COR shall follow the <br />standard review process for site plan review and subdivision found in this chapter and shall include <br />subdivision and site plan review. <br />(f) Relationship to other Code sections. The COR district is structured to establish a regulatory framework <br />intended to be administered separate from certain sections of this chapter. In order to prevent <br />overlapping development regulations, the following portions of this chapter are not applicable to the <br />COR district: article II, divisions 3 (zoning districts), 6 (performance standards), and 8 (signs), unless <br />it is determined by the city that provisions from these sections are better suited to address any <br />particular aspect of a development proposal. The provisions contained in article III of this chapter shall <br />regulate land subdivision of The COR district. <br />(Code 1978, § 9.20.25; Ord. No. 82-02, 3-20-1982; Ord. No. 86-2, 8-25-1986; Ord. No. 93-06, 4-23- <br />1993; Ord. No. 96-12, 7-29-1996; Ord. No. 97-09, 7-28-1997; Ord. No. 03-21, 8-25-2003; Ord. No. <br />03-22, 8-25-2003; Ord. No. 03-40, 11-3-2003; Ord. No. 04-11, 5-17-2004; Ord. No. 04-41, 12-6- <br />2004; Ord. No. 05-11, 5-30-2005; Ord. No. 05-15, 8-15-2005; Ord. No. 07-06, § 2, 2-27-2007; Ord. <br />No. 09-12, § 2, 9-8-2009; Ord. No. 10-17, § 1, 12-14-2010; Ord. No. 11-05, § 1, 4-12-2011; Ord. No. <br />12-03, § 1, 2-28-2012) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.