My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/22/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council - 07/22/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:21:42 PM
Creation date
8/22/2014 3:37:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/22/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 4. 4. <br />Meeting Date: 07/22/2014 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Request for Preliminary Plat Approval for Rabbit Meadows, a Major Plat to be Located on PID <br />#08-32-25-21-0003; Case of Eric and Karla Thomsen <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received applications for Preliminary Plat approval for Rabbit Meadows and a variance to cul-de-sac <br />length. Rabbit Meadows is a proposed Major Plat that would create three (3) new single family lots with an <br />extension of 171st Ave terminating in a full cul-de-sac. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within a 700 foot radius of the Property of the Public Hearing via <br />Standard US Mail. The Public Hearing was also published in the City's official newsletter, the Anoka County <br />UnionHerald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Applicant is seeking to develop a parcel that is just under ten (10) acres in size with three (3) single family <br />residential lots. The newly created lots would be accessed by an extension of 171st Ave terminating in a full <br />cul-de-sac. The Subject Property is zoned R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) and the proposed subdivision <br />complies with the minimum standards outlined in Section 117-111 (R-1 Residential District) regarding lot size, lot <br />width, and density. It also appears that there is sufficient space on each lot to accommodate a house pad compliant <br />with required setbacks. <br />The Applicant has incorporated a corridor, in the form of a sixty-six (66) foot Drainage and Utility Easement, <br />extending from the end of the cul-de-sac to the eastern limits of the plat as was discussed during the review of the <br />Sketch Plan. This corridor could serve be utilized as a potential future street connection to the parcel to the east, <br />should it ever develop. <br />The extension of 171st Ave NW to serve the three (3) newly created lots will result in a cul-de-sac length greater <br />than 600 feet, which requires a variance. It should be noted that there are existing concerns that City Staff have <br />identified regarding the existing stretch of 171st Ave that presently terminates with a hammerhead. The existing <br />road configuration creates challenges for snow plowing as there is not sufficient turn -around space for a plow truck. <br />Additionally, there presently is not sufficient right-of-way space at the hammerhead for snow storage. Finally, as <br />this is a non-hydranted area, responding to a fire would require a tanker truck and there is not sufficient <br />maneuverability with the existing conditions. Thus, while the cul-de-sac would be slightly longer than permitted <br />(751 feet total length), it would address and eliminate existing concerns that have been raised by our Public Works <br />and Fire Staff. The Planning Commission did approve a variance to cul-de-sac length at their July 10, 2014 meeting. <br />Each lot will be serviced with individual wells and septic systems. <br />The Applicant will need to obtain a Lower Rum River Water Management Organization (LRRWMO) permit. <br />The landscape plan is generally acceptable with the revisions as outlined in the July 3, 2014 Preliminary Staff <br />Review Letter. The Applicant has submitted a report from an ISA Certified Arborist noting that there are no <br />significant trees within the limits of construction and thus, a tree preservation plan is not required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.