My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 07/22/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 07/22/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:21:55 PM
Creation date
8/25/2014 11:02:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
07/22/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Question D13: do we need to keep if D14 covers? <br />We do need to keep question D13. The two question series is modeled after the census, which asks <br />ethnicity (Hispanic or not) separately from race (white, Black, Asian, etc.). We have to use this series of <br />questions because the results will be weighted to match the Census numbers for Ramsey. This would be <br />true for The NCS or a custom survey. <br />NOT DONE, for the reason identified above <br />General comment: we are concerned with the general public having access to the online survey for <br />statistical significance purposes. The survey should only allowed for people whom were targeted in <br />your statistical significant pool (i.e. mailed surveys). If we don't have the ability to protect this <br />concern —please pull the online survey option. <br />We have the ability to look at IP addresses and time stamps and other patterns of responses to identify <br />instances of sharing links outside of the scientific sample. From doing this, we have found ballot -stuffing <br />behavior to be very rare for general citizen surveys or involving a very small number of responses. If that <br />is not reassuring enough for Council, then we are happy to forgo the online survey. <br />After discussion with NRC, we decided to pull the online survey option. The NRC does not have the ability <br />to effectively track people filling out surveys/disable people from sharing an online version of the survey. <br />DONE, online survey was pulled. <br />General comment: our council would like a 'comment' section added to the bottom of each page <br />(where appropriate). NOTE: we do not expect you to tabulate results. We can simply review said <br />comments internally. Please keep this section as short and concise as possible. Also, please indicate <br />comments are not required (only if desired). <br />The survey can accommodate open-ended questions on the last page as space allows. Even for a custom <br />survey we would advise limiting the number of open-ended questions and keeping them until the end to <br />avoid discouraging respondents from completing the survey; just having the blank response lines there <br />(even with the text that it is optional) can turn the survey into a high -burden request. It looks like there is <br />just enough space to fit such a question in on the last page, so I have gone ahead and included it. Since <br />you don't require any data entry, the add -on to provide a CD with all of the scanned surveys is just $50 <br />compared to $1500 per question for data entry and analysis. <br />DONE, but only on one page for the reasons stated above. <br />Due to the several changes we made to the 'template' National Citizen Survey —are we in danger of <br />losing the standard/professional/high-quality reporting? We want to make sure our Council receives <br />a quality/useful product and comparisons. <br />I'd say we are pretty close to keeping it an NCS survey with all of the good value that that package offers. <br />Right now, any standard, unaltered item on the survey will have benchmark comparisons. If more items <br />need to be added, deleted or reformatted outside of the customized sections (including adding open <br />ended questions before the end of the survey), then we need to move to the custom option. Trying to <br />keep it to the same budget level would involve significantly paring down the reporting [if we become a <br />'custom' survey], but I understand that not every community is the same and getting the questions just <br />right is an important priority. <br />DONE, we will still get the high quality reporting and comparisons. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.