Laserfiche WebLink
Last revised July 24, 2014 <br />Part IV: Opportunities for Impact <br />The process of developing this Housing Policy Plan has produced rich conversation and discussion <br />over the last year. However, it has become clear that there are a series of even richer dialogues that <br />the region needs to have beyond what the Council was able to achieve in developing this Plan. This <br />section describes areas where the Council intends to conduct additional analysis and convene or <br />participate in broader regional discussions on how to move ahead in the coming years. If appropriate, <br />the Council will amend the Housing Policy Plan to reflect any new policy direction emerging from these <br />discussions. <br />Items on the Council's future housing policy workplan include: <br />• Reduction of barriers to development of mixed -income housing. <br />• Exploration of inclusionary housing strategies. <br />• Assessment of feasibility of strategies to share risk. <br />• Shared regional strategies to affirmatively further fair housing and address housing <br />discrimination. <br />• Building wealth and expanding investment in Areas of Concentrated Poverty. <br />Reduce barriers to development of mixed -income housing <br />Mixed -income housing development holds the potential to create vibrant, diverse communities that offer <br />choices to a range of households. Moreover, mixed -income development can be more politically viable <br />and appealing to neighbors than developments of solely affordable units. The financing of mixed - <br />income housing, however, presents several special challenges. How the region collectively overcomes <br />these barriers will have important implications for the prospects of households of varied incomes within <br />properties, districts, and neighborhoods, including transitway station areas. <br />What is mixed -income housing? <br />Mixed -income housing, in its strictest sense, refers to developments that mix market -rate or income - <br />unrestricted units and subsidized units affordable to low- and moderate -income households. One <br />previously common approach is the so-called "80/20s" in which 80% of units are market rate and 20% <br />are affordable and where the market -rate rents are expected to help cross -subsidize the rental revenue <br />"lost" by including the affordable units. This approach, however, inappropriately polarizes the market <br />rate and affordable components by creating the presumption that the market -rate rents are high and <br />achievable and that the rents of the affordable units are low, deeply targeted, and deeply subsidized. In <br />practice, however, there are a number of additional ways that mixed -income projects are possible <br />beyond the 80/20. For example: <br />• A project that has less than 20% affordable units but requires some number or proportion might <br />still be called mixed -income. <br />• A project that has 80% income -targeted, subsidized units might have 20% market rate units and <br />be called mixed -income. <br />• Even a project that is "100% affordable" can and usually does still serve mixed incomes with <br />some units reserved at households earning 60% of AMI, some reserved for households earning <br />80% of AM I, and some targeted to households at or below 30% of AMI. <br />2040 HOUSING POLICY PLAN I METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />DRAFT RELEASED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Part IV: Opportunities for Impact I Page 62 <br />