Laserfiche WebLink
Last revised July 24, 2014 <br />households (note that this does not address the housing needs of any of the existing low- and <br />moderate -income households who were paying more than 30% of their income on housing (that is, <br />experiencing housing cost burden) at the end of 2010). Over the first two years of the decade the <br />region added 2,272 new affordable units, meeting less than 5% of the decade -long need. At this pace, <br />it will take the region more than four decades to meet only one decade's need for affordable housing <br />without addressing either the need for affordable housing that existed in 2010 or the growing need that <br />accompanies continued household growth. <br />From 2011 to 2013, the "Super RFP"—the state's largest single source for financing housing for low- <br />income households and which includes contributions from federal, state, and non-profit funding <br />partners including Minnesota Housing, the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic <br />Development (DEED), the Minnesota Department of Health, the Family Housing Fund, the Greater <br />Minnesota Housing Fund, and the Metropolitan Council —deployed all available resources to fund <br />construction of less than 2,000 new affordable rental units in the metro area, far below the need. Many <br />of these units received capital through the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) public -private <br />partnerships. Nationwide, the LIHTC program has leveraged almost $100 billion in private investment <br />capital since 1986 toward the development of more than 2.6 million affordable units. However, the long- <br />term future of these significant LIHTC resources is at risk as the tax credit, one of the largest corporate <br />tax expenditures, is vulnerable to elimination or substantial cuts under various proposals to lower <br />corporate tax rates. (For more detailed descriptions of the Super RFP and the LIHTC program, please <br />see the Appendix.) <br />Affordable housing helps build communities <br />The availability of housing affordable and appropriate to an individual's or household's needs can be <br />problematic for households across an array of incomes. Generally speaking, housing is regarded as <br />affordable when a household pays no more than 30% of monthly gross income on housing, whether a <br />mortgage payment and related costs of ownership or rent and utilities. Quality housing affordable to <br />low- and moderate -income households can be even more difficult to secure in certain locations due to a <br />plethora of factors, not the least of which is a resistance in some communities to welcome and promote <br />affordable housing development. <br />Great strides have been made in improving the quality of affordable housing and reducing the stigma of <br />affordable housing. More people are familiar with the idea that many working households, even those <br />considered "professional," make incomes that qualify them for "affordable" housing. Despite this, <br />additional education is needed. Many people still believe that housing affordable to low- and moderate - <br />income households is undesirable in their community. Furthermore, the need remains greatest for <br />households at the lowest income levels or who have other significant support needs, such as mental <br />illness, chemical dependence, or disabilities. Having a variety of housing types, including housing <br />affordable to very low-income households or those with special support needs, is not only a necessity, <br />but part of a well-balanced, economically resilient community and an economically competitive region. <br />2040 HOUSING POLICY PLAN I METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />DRAFT RELEASED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Part I: Introduction I Page 11 <br />