My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 09/16/2003 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2003
>
Minutes - Council - 09/16/2003 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 4:11:21 PM
Creation date
1/12/2004 10:56:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
09/16/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
developer, but if they remove the language pertaining to the structure parking, the City will lose <br />their "hook". <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that Councilmember Strommen was concerned that the City may <br />not be able to assess the 50 percent of the project cost if they are not able to show benefit. The <br />Council could request that that restriction be removed from the agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that she would feel more comfortable with that. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec and Councilmembers Elvig and Pearson all expressed agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that he felt that the developers had the financial backing to <br />build the parking ramps and certainly they want some good roads to come into the area. If the <br />City is going to have to spend heavy on roads within the site, utilities and parking ramps than <br />maybe they will not have funds to assist with the major roadways. He suggested that the City <br />assess 100 percent of the project cost to the developer. <br /> <br />Majority consensus was to proceed with the 50/50 cost split once the structure parking ramp at <br />the time it is built. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that Article 10 Developer Public Improvements requires a one- <br />year warranty on all developer-installed improvements, which is required by City ordinance. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman explained that in Section 11.1 Landscaping Associated with City <br />Phase I Roadway, there was the addition of the word seasonality and language was included to <br />define seasonality by dates on the calendar. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman noted that no changes were made to 12.3 City Costs. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if the date pertaining to the $50,000 letter of credit should be tied to a <br />certain amount of development. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained that the $50,000 is to pay for City administrative and <br />consulting fees incurred by the development and was agreed to into the memorandum of <br />understanding. It was staff's assumption that City staff would be primarily out of the <br />development by December 31, 2007. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that at the last work session, the Council had discussed how a <br />letter of credit is held. That issue is addressed in 12.4 Letters of Credit and Alternative Security <br />and the only letter of credit that will be allowed to be released in a one year period is the full site <br />grading. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson explained that the City's regular practice is to require <br />an automatic renewable of letter of credit that only the City can authorize release of. <br /> <br />City Council Special Meeting/September 16, 2003 <br /> Page 5 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.