My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 09/16/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2014
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 09/16/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:41:35 AM
Creation date
9/18/2014 2:23:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
09/16/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Works Committee 6. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 09/16/2014 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Review draft Special Assessment Policy for City Improvement Projects <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to review the most current draft of the Special Assessment Policy for City of Ramsey <br />improvement projects, and to provide input to City Staff for revising the draft Policy. <br />Background: <br />On May 20th the Public Works Committee directed Staff to develop a draft Special Assessments Policy to establish <br />how special assessments will be levied against properties benefiting from various types of City improvement <br />projects, including street reconstruction projects. As discussed at the time, even if special assessments are not <br />needed to fund improvement projects it would be advantageous to the City to have an adopted assessment policy. <br />The Committee also directed staff to research other cities special assessments policies to see how other cities <br />address specific situations and apply special considerations in assessing property owners for public improvements. <br />On June 25th the Charter Commission voted to amend Section 8.4.5 of the City Charter, increasing the percentage <br />of property owners required to petition against Council initiated public improvements utilizing special assessments <br />as a funding source from greater than 50% to greater than 60%. While this action will make it slightly more <br />difficult for the public to petition against Council initiated improvement projects, it will still not prevent property <br />owners from petitioning against Council initiated public improvements utilizing special assessments as a funding <br />source. <br />On August 14th the Public Works Committee reviewed the draft Special Assessment Policy but since Chairperson <br />Backous and Councilmember Kuzma were absent Staff was directed to bring the draft Policy back at a later date <br />for the full Committee to weigh in on. However, several comments were from the Committee members in <br />attendance as follows. If MSA funds are applicable they should be applied to the City's share of the project costs, <br />City Staff needs to ensure there are no conflicts between the Policy and the City Charter, and the Policy should <br />provide as much flexibility as possible in considering existing property sizes, shapes, development status <br />(developed vs. undeveloped), etc. <br />Attached is the draft Special Assessment Policy as reviewed by the Committee on August 14th. Text highlighted in <br />yellow will require revisions based on existing Charter provisions and/or input from the Public Works Committee. <br />Staff also proposes to delete all text in red strikethrough format, and blue underlined text is new language as <br />proposed by Staff. The draft Policy is based on the model Special Assessments Policy prepared by Ehlers and <br />Associates, Inc. as posted on the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) web site. The model Policy has been amended <br />to address special considerations relevant to the City of Ramsey. A list of these considerations is included below. <br />Should the Public Works Committee consider any of these considerations to be irrelevant or unnecessary they can <br />be deleted from the draft Policy. Conversely, additional considerations can be added to the draft Policy per <br />direction from the Committee. <br />Timeframe: <br />Approximately 25 minutes for presentation and discussion. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.