My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/13/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 01/13/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:17:55 PM
Creation date
1/13/2004 9:27:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/13/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PrO CASE <br /> <br />CONSIDER TRAIL COMPLETION OF THE T.H. #47 TRAIL <br /> By: Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Residential areas along T.H. #47 have been greatly expanded in the last several years with the <br />additions of the Apple Ridge, River Pines, Evergreen Point, Alpine Meadows, Wildlife <br />Sanctuary, and Sunflower Ridge. All of these subdivisions are within the two-mile walking <br />distance to Ramsey Elementary School. Roughly three fourths of a mile of new trail has been <br />constructed in the last year extending off-road trail from Alpine Drive to the northern boundary <br />of River Pines 5th Addition. This segment of trail is complete, except a length of 233 feet in <br />front of 15700 St. Francis Boulevard. The trail immediately north and south of this property has <br />been constructed 10 to 20 feet west of the western T.H. 47 right-of-way. <br /> <br />The simplest and least costly method of completing this trail would be to connect the existing <br />end points of the existing rail. This would require a twenty-foot trail easement across this <br />property. This trail connection could be accomplished without significant tree loss. Several <br />small spruce trees could be transplanted from the path alignment to provide additional screening <br />of the highway and trail. However, the property owners have indicated to City staff during <br />informal conversations, that they were opposed to the trail extension through their property. <br /> <br />Am alternate to connecting the end points of the existing trail would entail using the highway <br />right-of-way. At this location, the highway right-of-way is 60 feet from centerline. There is 14 <br />to 16 feet of pavement and a roadside ditch to accommodate drainage. The remainder of the <br />right-of-way could be used to accommodate the trail, however, there are a number of issues <br />which would need to be resolved. <br /> <br />If there is a substantial grade difference (about 7 to 10 feet) between the existing trail and <br />the bottom of the ditch. It may be necessary to construct a retaining wall, which would <br />require a temporary construction easement from the property owners. Am alternative may <br />be to fill in the ditch and install a curb section along this segment of the roadway. <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />Sections of the existing trail would need to be removed, so that the alignment could be <br />transitioned from the easement to the right-of-way. <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />If the highway is widened to four lanes, the separation distance betwveen the traffic and <br />trail would be reduced to 26-foot or less. The existing trail is approximately 60 feet from <br />the edge of the roadway. <br /> <br />-226- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.