Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin August 25, 2014 l Volume 8 l Issue 16 <br />Nonconforming Use —County <br />prohibits expansion of <br />nonconforming gravel operation <br />Gravel operator contends that under Wyoming <br />statute, county has no authority to prohibit <br />expansion of nonconforming land uses <br />Citation: Seherr-Thoss v. Teton CountyBd. of County Com'rs, 2014 WY82, <br />2014 WL 2921818 (Wyo. 2014) <br />WYOMING (06/25/14)—This case addressed the issue of whether Wyo- <br />ming statutory law—Wyo. Stat. § 18-5-207—prevents counties from prohibit- <br />ing or otherwise regulating or limiting the expansion or enlargement of the use <br />of land for continued extraction and processing of gravel. More generally, it <br />addressed the extent of § 18-5-207's protection of nonconforming land uses. <br />The Background/Facts: Roger Seherr-Thoss ("RST") and his father <br />owned and operated an approximately 350-acre cattle ranch in Teton County, <br />Wyoming (the "County"). Since at least 1977, RST and his father stopped <br />other economic pursuits, cut back on their livestock operation, and focused on <br />operating a gravel operation. Since that time, they have continuously operated <br />a gravel operation within the 350-acre ranch. <br />In 1978, the County enacted its first Land Development Regulations <br />("LDRs"). Under those LDRs, RST's land was zoned residential -agricultural. <br />Gravel operations were not peinuitted in such zones without a special -use <br />permit ("SUP") from the County. In 1994, the County repealed and replaced <br />the 1978 LDRs with the 1994 LDRs, which also prohibited gravel operations <br />on RST's property. <br />In 1995, the County began investigating and attempting to enforce its LDRs <br />against RST. At that time, RST's gravel operation used approximately three <br />acres. From 1995 to 2010, the County and RST engaged in discussions regard- <br />ing the legality of RST's use of his property. Eventually, in June 2010, the <br />County Planning Director issued a Notice to Abate to RST. The notice ordered <br />RST to cease gravel crushing and extraction operations on his property and to <br />reduce his screening and stockpiling to pre-1978 levels. The Notice to Abate <br />was amended in February 2011 to also require RST to reduce his production <br />levels to pre-1978 levels. <br />RST appealed to the County Board of Commissioners (the "Board"). <br />The Board recognized that RST's gravel operation was grandfathered under <br />Wyoming statutory law—Wyo. Stat. Ann., § 18-5-207. However, the Board <br />also concluded that RST's land use was grandfathered only to the extent of his <br />operations at the time the LDRs became effective in 1978. The Board ordered <br />RST to reduce the footprint of his operation and the volume of extracted gravel <br />from his operation to pre-1978 levels or the size that the earliest available evi- <br />dence indicated —which was three acres and 15,000 cubic yards or 17,000 <br />tons per year. <br />2014 Thomson Reuters 9 <br />