Laserfiche WebLink
• Projects that impair the use and enjoyment of the Regional Parks System unit due to excessive <br />noise, air pollution or water pollution, and <br />• Projects that interfere with the operation and maintenance of the Regional Parks System unit <br />Where appropriate, the Council will initiate or accept for initiation a metropolitan significance review of <br />specific projects if it is necessary to help protect the Regional Parks System. A project that is consistent <br />with a Council- approved local comprehensive plan is exempt from metropolitan significance reviews for <br />metropolitan system effects. <br />In accordance with the Council's Thrive principles, increasing population densities in urban areas is <br />preferable to scattered developments throughout the rural and agricultural areas of the metropolitan <br />region. Increasing population densities adjacent to urban Regional Parks System units is not a <br />detriment to those units if the urban development is designed in ways that are sensitive to areas that <br />enjoy scenic views and the natural features of the Regional Parks System unit, and do not interfere with <br />the operation and maintenance of the unit. The Council will work cooperatively with local governments <br />to help ensure urban development and land uses in areas adjacent to Regional Parks System units <br />occur in ways that preserve the integrity of the Regional Parks System. <br />System Protection - Strategy 2: Conversion of Regional Parks System lands to other <br />uses <br />Lands in the Regional Parks System will only be converted to other uses if approved by the <br />Metropolitan Council through an equally valuable land or facility exchange as defined below: <br />"Equally valuable land" is defined as land that: <br />• is contiguous to the Regional Parks System unit containing the land proposed to be <br />exchanged (within the same park/trail unit) <br />• has comparable or better natural resource characteristics, and <br />• could provide comparable or better recreation opportunities than the land being released <br />from the covenant <br />In exceptional circumstances, the Metropolitan Council may accept as equally valuable land the <br />addition of land to another unit of the regional parks system where: <br />• the replacement land has comparable or better natural resource characteristics <br />• the replacement land has comparable or better recreation opportunities than the land <br />being converted, and <br />• no other reasonable alternative exists and where all other provisions of this policy can be <br />met <br />"Equally valuable facility" is defined as an exchange of land for facilities when recreational <br />benefits and /or natural resource benefits are increased as a result of the exchange. For example, <br />some land within a regional trail corridor may be exchanged to widen a highway if a highway <br />