Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 3. <br />Meeting Date: 10/14/2014 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Draft Special Assessments Policy for City Improvement Projects <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to review the draft Special Assessments Policy for City Improvements, and to provide <br />input to City Staff to allow adoption of the Policy in November of 2014. <br />Background: <br />On May 20th the Public Works Committee directed Staff to develop a draft Special Assessments Policy to establish <br />how special assessments will be levied against properties benefiting from various types of City improvements, <br />including street reconstruction projects. As discussed at the time, even if special assessments are not used to fund <br />street improvement projects it would be advantageous for the City to have an adopted Special Assessments Policy. <br />The Committee also directed staff to research other cities special assessments policies to see how they address <br />specific situations and apply special considerations in assessing property owners for public improvements. <br />On June 25th the Charter Commission voted to amend Section 8.4.5 of the City Charter, increasing the percentage <br />of property owners required to petition against Council initiated public improvements utilizing special assessments <br />as a funding source from greater than 50% to 60% or more. While this action will make it slightly more difficult for <br />the public to petition against Council initiated improvement projects, it will still not prevent property owners from <br />petitioning against Council initiated public improvements utilizing special assessments as a funding source. <br />On August 14th the Public Works Committee reviewed the first draft of the Special Assessments Policy, which was <br />developed using the model Special Assessments Policy prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. as posted on the <br />League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) web site. However, Chairperson Backous and Councilmember Kuzma were <br />both absent so Staff was directed to bring the draft Policy back at a later date for review by the full Committee. <br />However, the Committee members in attendance that evening provided several comments as follows. Any <br />applicable MSA funds must first be applied to the City's share of the project costs, no conflicts can exist between <br />the Policy and the City Charter, and the Policy should provide as much flexibility as possible in considering <br />existing property sizes, shapes, development status (developed vs. undeveloped), etc. These comments were <br />subsequently incorporated into the draft Policy. <br />On September 16th the Public Works Committee again reviewed the draft Special Assessments Policy. After <br />considerable discussion, Staff was directed to revise the draft Policy to incorporate the Committee's proposed <br />assessment percentages, and to incorporate staff's proposed recommendations on the use of the various assessment <br />methods, then to bring the draft Policy directly to a City Council Work Session for review and input from the full <br />Council. <br />Attached is the latest draft of the Special Assessments Policy. Text shown in red strike -through format is proposed <br />for deletion, while blue underlined text is new language as proposed by the Public Works Committee and by City <br />Staff. <br />Staff is seeking Council input on the draft Policy including the proposed assessment percentages listed in Section <br />10, and on the special considerations listed in Section 6 including whether costs for subgrade excavation and rural <br />to urban street conversions should be non -assessable costs paid solely by the City. Other special considerations may <br />be desirable to reduce assessable costs as warranted, especially when considering that special assessments levied at <br />