Laserfiche WebLink
resolution. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Cox to adopt <br />Resolution #85-60 authorizing change order no. 1 to Improvement Projects #84- <br />18 and #84-19 S.A.P. 199-105-02. (Please refer to resolution file for <br />Resolution 985-60). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers COx, Sorteberg, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />~ Author]zatiQ~ Rna, Call For Price~:Ouat~s _?or ~nnua] SDrinq~ P~h <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Schlueter to <br />approve of the City of Ramsey advertising for price quotes for rabies shots at <br />the spring pet clinic. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />~ Rn~neer]nq, (Continued%: <br /> <br />H. Qise,~onOn Assessment Methods For Stor~ Sewer. Improvements_In <br /> Water~hed District #432 <br /> <br />City Engineer Raatikka explained the following alternatives which have been <br />discussed for assessing on storm sewer improvements in Watershed District #43: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />Have the developer pay for storm sewer improvements needed in <br />Flintwood II - $151,000; this leaves a total of $82,000 which could <br />be assessed across the entire Drainage District 943 and amounts <br />to $53/acre. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />Have the developer assessed for improvements in Flintwood II - <br />$151,000; City picks up 20% of the cost - $43,000; remaining <br />$37,000 assessed over the initial assessment area at about $123/acre. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman noted that in these two alternatives that in addition to the <br />developer picking up the $151,000 for improvements in Flintwood II, the units <br />in Flintwood II would also be assessed as though they were existing residents <br />in Drainage District #43. <br /> <br />City Engineer Raatikka stated that the negative concerns with the above <br />mentioned alternatives is that they eliminate the one-time assessment; <br />District 943 may involve several storm sewer projects and all residents would <br />be subject to an assessment for each project. Mr. Raatikka also stated that <br />both of the alternatives discussed present major administrative problems. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that the developer could appeal the additional assessment; <br />the developer's assessment of $151,000 is taking care of his storm sewer needs <br />in Flintwood II; Mr. Raatikka stated that he feels the developer would win the <br />case if it went to court. <br /> <br />February 27, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 14 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />