Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Mayor Heitman to adopt Resolution <br />#85-107 ordering improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for <br />Sealcoating Improvement Project 985-10 (Oakridge Estates area). (Please refer <br />to resolution file for Resolution 985-107). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Re/mann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember COx and seconded by Councilmember Reimann to adopt <br />Resolution #85-108 ordering improvement and preparation of plans and <br />specifications for Sealcoating Improvement Project #85-11 (Pineview Estates <br />area). (Please refer to resolution file for Resolution #85-108). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmenbers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />Adopt Resolution For Ordering Improvement And Preparation Of Plans And <br />Specifications For Sealcoating Improvement Project %85-13 (167th Avenue <br />NW - M.S.A.S.) - <br /> <br />Council unanimously consented to dispense with the reading of the resolution. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seconded by Councilme~ber COx to adopt <br />Resolution %85-109 ordering improvement and preparation of plans and <br />specifications for Sealcoating Improvement Project #85-13 for 167th Avenue NW <br />(M.S.A.S.). (Please refer to resolution file for Resolution %85-109). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, COx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case %3: Requ_ est For Metes And Bounds Subdivision; Case Of Ms. Lorrai~m <br /> stone ~ <br /> <br />Mayor Hei~an stated that Ms. Stone has requested that her case be removed from <br />tonight' s Council agenda. <br /> <br />Council requested that City Staff contact Ms. Stone regarding whether or not <br />she would like her case placed on a future agenda or withdrawn from <br />consideration completely. <br /> <br />Case %4.- Requ_ est For Preliminary P.U.D. _Approval: Case Of North Fork. Inc: <br /> <br />Mr. Mike Gair was present and stated that the developers have complied with <br />those items contained in City Engineer Raatikka's letter dated June 5, 1985. <br />Mr. Gair stated that the developers have no problem with the proposed <br />development agreement and resolution. <br /> <br />Councilmember Re/mann noted that there is only one access road to the <br />develou~nt. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka replied that a condition of the development agreement is to <br />require that the developer extend that road south through the plat to provide <br />another access within 3 years. <br /> June 11, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />