Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Kuzma and Riley. Abstain: Chairperson <br />Backous. Voting No: None. <br />5. COMMITTEE BUSINESS <br />5.01: Review Storm water Pond Maintenance and Aquatic Vegetation Conditions <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood reviewed the staff report and <br />pointed out several storm water ponds in the City with aquatic vegetation and algae. He noted <br />that algae and vegetation is quite common, and showed an image of pond conditions at Emerald <br />Pond Park that a resident asked the Committee to see. The City's existing policy does not <br />include vegetation management. He explained storm water vegetation management is difficult <br />given nutrient loading from land uses, and there can be significant cost implications. <br />Chairperson Backous asked whether the City provides any maintenance as far as aesthetics. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood replied the City presently does not, <br />and vegetation maintenance could be cost prohibitive. <br />Mayor Strommen stated this is a misalignment of expectations. She suggested because the pond <br />in question is in a park, there may be an expectation that the City would handle these issues. <br />Councilmember Kuzma questioned whether the City could even perform vegetation removal, if <br />this is prohibited due to wetland policy or regulations that the City does not have the jurisdiction <br />over. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood explained that sedimentation ponds <br />created by the City can be maintained by the City. However, there can be a long list of <br />permitting authorities, the Wetland Conservation Act, and city rules and regulations that relate to <br />this issue. Due to the imposing staff time and expense, it becomes expensive. He further noted <br />the individual bringing up this issue asked whether the City could add herbicides that are <br />designated for water. He said if the Committee thought this should be investigated, this question <br />should be brought up to the Environmental Policy Board and the DNR. The DNR only permits <br />herbicides regulated by the EPA for use in water bodies in vegetation. It is never permitted for <br />aesthetics. There are many considerations in using this type of herbicide such as applying it in <br />the proper window of growing conditions, and timing the application so that the wind, or rain <br />does not wash the treatment away, and the costs are higher than just the chemical, as a Certified <br />Pesticide Applicator may have to apply the treatment. <br />Councilmember Kuzma suggested an article be written for the Ramsey Resident in terms of <br />education on these issues to reach those homeowners that may want to take this procedure on <br />themselves. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood acknowledged that information on <br />vegetation maintenance should be shared with the public in as many ways as possible. <br />Public Works Committee / September 16, 2014 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />