Resolution - #14-10-208 Planning - 10/09/2014

Home

8. That the location of the proposed privacy fence will be within the front yard setback of the Subject Property and therefore will be two (2) feet greater than what is allowed according to City Code Section 117 -111 (R -1 Residential District). 9. That, if granted, the Variance will not allow the Applicant to deviate from other fence standards described in City Code Section 117 -111. 10. That Anoka County will locate the public right -of -way boundaries, which will assist the Applicant in properly locating the fence to be entirely on the Subject Property. 11. That economic circumstances alone do not create the practical difficulties. 12. That the plight is due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property. 13. That the plight was not created by the Applicant. 14. That, if granted, the Variance will not alter locality's essential character. 15. That, if granted, the Variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 16. That, if granted, the Variance will not unreasonably increase congestion on the public street. 17. That, if granted, the Variance will not have the effect of allowing any uses prohibited in the applicable zoning district. 18. That if granted, the Variance will not permit a lesser degree of public health, safety, and general welfare. 19. That, if granted, the Variance will not permit standards that are lower than those required by state law. 20. That, if granted, the Variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger public safety. 21. That, if granted, the Variance will not diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Maul, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chairperson Levine Commissioner Bauer Commissioner Maul Commissioner Nosan Commissioner Van Scoy RESOLUTION #14 -10 -208 Page 2 of 3