Laserfiche WebLink
same intercepting design, but with a <br />left-in movement, was proposed for traf- <br />fic from the north. This would distribute <br />ve~icle circulation demands across the <br />site, reducing congestion for morning <br />and afternoon commuters and for <br />evening shoppers and diners. The park- <br />ing facilities will fall between two signal- <br />ized intersections on the adjacent devel- <br />oping transit corridor, and the plan calls <br />for working with the Dakota County <br />Transportation Depar~J-nent to modify <br />the signal loops at those intersections <br />to favor morning and afternoon com- <br />muters entering and exiting [he site. <br />Residential areas <br />The proposed aparu*nent buildings are <br />designed to connect with the green <br />space and pedestrian paths in several <br />ways. First floor apartments will have <br />small courtyards opening onto the <br />greenway to create mutual oversight <br />between the green space and apartment <br />areas and improve the security of both. <br />As mentioned above, this sense of visu- <br />al and social connection was designed <br />into the location of plan elements rela- <br />tive to the senior homes as well. From a <br />formal design standpoint, the apar~J-nent <br />courtyards will soften the often harsh <br />visual transition ~etween vertical three* <br />story apar~ument buildings and the hori- <br />zontal ground plane, and increase the <br />visual interest. <br /> Performing shared use parking analy- <br />ses in the pianning process reduced the <br /> <br />COUNTY <br /> <br />How ~he five Minnesota <br />public agencies coordinated <br />their objectives and <br />resources <br /> <br />VALL_m¢ <br />TRANSfT, <br />AUTHORITY <br /> <br />COMMUNITY <br /> TRANSIT <br /> STATION <br /> <br /> Community <br /> Existing Apartments Greenspace <br /> <br /> ~ [' ' ... '" 'Residential <br /> '.~ ' .'- .,-. ' ' ,. Access -----m <br /> .'z:' ..i ,... ¢,l,.:..:~..-.'~,.. '7. ' "~J~J;;~-"-~-~.~2~:"'~.-'; Street l <br /> .,,%.,. ,-, . ~.. ~¢. ":-",~-~"~ ,~¢~....~.. '*. . ,,, -'-. . .:~.%¢,~2, <br /> <br />. _ ~, ~,, ~.,. . .~_[ <br /> <br />A B <br /> <br /> __ ~Nor~h~South , Transit Station <br /> i~oad ay ~ · <br /> ~---- Climc ~;.,~ <br /> ,". '... . 'l. Sha~ed-Use-;'!"l :.,. Canopy Area <br /> .~'""~" .~ it):":¢.' [.. Park/Ride ...... ..-.~:[: ~ Re~ai] <br /> <br /> . .' "'~.~ ~Z-~t'dJ;~¢,q'~ Left <br />~,.; ......... ~,, <br /> <br /> C <br /> <br />Section5 of the community transit station, looking south <br /> <br />duplication of parking-lot construction <br />and allowed proposed apartment devel- <br />opment densities to approach 30 units <br />per acre in this suburban area. Residen- <br />tial parking would be divided be[ween <br />underground stalls (one per unit) and <br />on-site surface stalls. The large area of <br />shared use park-and-dale parking within <br />the retail center would be available on <br />evenings and weekends for residential <br />overflow. <br />Commercial/retail <br />The retai! components proposed in the <br />master plan are sited to take advantage <br />of high traffic volume and visibility along <br />the adjacent thoroughfare. Because the <br />plan locates additional stalls in the <br />shared use park-and-ride parking area <br />directly behind the buildings, parking for <br />retail activities along the roadway side <br />of the buildings was allocated at one- <br />half the normal amount of retail parking <br />required by zoning ordinances. Numer- <br />ous passageways through the proposed <br />retail buildings provide effective connec- <br />tions to this parking, and also connect <br />back into the community green space, <br />residential areas and extended path <br />system. <br /> With a smaller amount of parking in <br /> <br />PASSENGER <br /> <br />TERMinAL <br /> <br />73 <br /> <br />'96 <br /> <br /> <br />