Laserfiche WebLink
lour 1111.1siion: To work together to reiposibty grow our community, and to provide quality, coat -effective, and efficient government ierrlcas. <br />CC Regular Session 6. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 10/28/2014 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Request to Vacate a Portion of Drainage and Utility Easement at 16205 Sapphire St <br />NW; Case of Scott Wold <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received an application from Mr. Scott Wold to consider vacating a portion of a Drainage and Utility <br />Easement (the "Easement") on the property located at 16205 Sapphire St NW (the "Subject Property"). <br />The Subject Property is part of the first phase of the Sweetbay Ridge subdivision. The approved grading plan <br />allowed for a custom graded lot at time of home construction. <br />Separately, as part of the required soil remediation work to remove lead contaminants from the site of this <br />subdivision, which was on the former St. Anthony Gun Club property, several feet of soil was removed from the <br />Subject Property. Clean replacement fill was not immediately imported, as it was thought that the individual lot <br />would develop in a short time frame. Shortly thereafter, the vacant parcels in the subdivision became subject to <br />foreclosure and no activity occurred on the Subject Property for a number of years. <br />During that timeframe, portions of the Subject Property where soils had been exported but not replaced, naturally <br />converted to wetland. When the owner of the Subject Property submitted a Building Permit application late in 2013, <br />the proposed home site was partially within standing water, which initiated a multi jurisdictional review process <br />that involved the City, the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization (LRRWMO) and the United States <br />Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This review revealed that not only had the wetland area naturally expanded, <br />but also that fill had been illegally placed within the delineated boundary of a wetland. <br />Notification: <br />Staff sent notification to all Property Owners within 350 of the Subject Property of the Public Hearing via Standard <br />US Mail. The Public Hearing Notice was also published in the Anoka County Union Herald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />In reviewing the Subject Property as platted, it presented a unique situation in which a narrow peninsula jutted out <br />into a wetland was to serve as the building site. The narrowness of the buildable area would have presented <br />challenges/concerns with potential wetland encroachments both during and after construction. As part of the <br />multi -agency review, another alternative arose that appeared to be more appropriate and desirable. The 'new' <br />wetland area appears to be a high quality wetland and was larger than the area where fill had been placed. Thus, the <br />owner of the Subject Property applied for and received approval for an after the fact wetland replacement plan that <br />would allow the construction of a single family home in an area where fill had been placed as shown on the attached <br />survey. However, prior to issuing a Building Permit, a portion of the Drainage and Utility Easement must be <br />