Laserfiche WebLink
Motion was withdrawn based on the fact that the applicant withdrew their request. <br /> <br />Councihnembe. r Elvig stated that he would be willing to attend a special session to address the <br />issue once some of the questions are answered. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamee recommended that the developer work with staff and if the information is <br />available and ~.taff is comfortable with the request he will call a special meeting. <br /> <br />Tim Engen, Ramsey Town Center, LLC, stated that they have done a lot this year for the <br />community a~d the pressure has been intense for staff and themselves. They are learning the <br />process along~,the way and are uncovering new legal formations that are going' to guide the <br />Ramsey Towr~ Center. They have enormous market pressures that need to start. They are not <br />trying to be .disrespectful staff. The difficulty is that there are staff members that are not quite <br />sure how to prbces$ information through staff and who handles what. <br /> <br />Case #14: iConsider Right of Way Agreement for Civic Center Drive <br /> <br />Assistant DireCtor of Public Works Olson stated that on September 25, 2003 the City Council <br />approved the final plat of the Ramsey Town Center (RTC). The approval of the RTC final plat <br />was continger[~r upon working out the details of the easements that are recorded along the south <br />side of the pl~t. An agreement was presented to the Council for their consideration that was <br />written by the ileveloper and agreed to by both Qwest and Connexus. <br /> <br />C. ouncilmemb~r Zimmerman inquired if the agreement would cost the City any money at this <br />t~me. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson replied no. <br /> <br />Motion by Copncilmember Pearson, seconded by. Councilmember Elvig, to approve the Right of <br />Way agreement for Civic Center Drive contingent on the conditions outlined and subject to the <br />City Attorney,s final review and non-material amendments. <br /> <br />Motion carrie~, vOting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmembers Pearson, Elvig, Cook, Kurak, <br />Strommen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #16: <br /> <br />i Parldng Lot Construction for Elmcrest park <br /> <br />Parks/Utilitiesl Supervisor Riverblood stated that the 2003 Capital Improvement Program <br />identifies $21~,000 for the creation of parking lots and the extension of the neighborhood street <br />as a park driWe into Elmcrest Park. The purpose of this case was to request the City Council <br />approve a no~ to exceed amount of $62,000 for the preparation of plans, specifications and <br />engineering s0rvices for the construction of the improvements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that he had some concerns with the layout and design of the parking <br />lot. It was hisiunderstanding that the Council was looking for some detailed specification criteria <br />and he did not think that information has been brought forward. What he does know is that there <br />is a terrible p~ ~btem at Central Park where single file cars have to go to the back area and cars <br /> <br /> City Council/December 16, 2003 <br /> Page 29 of 32 <br /> <br />P99 <br /> <br /> <br />