Laserfiche WebLink
User Guide to The National Citizen SurveyT" <br />this hypothetical community may want to focus its resources on sustaining or strengthening its image <br />as a safe place with many recreation opportunities and ease of travel by car and light rail. <br />How to Use Benchmarks <br />Many of the charts and tables in The NCS reports have been color -coded to indicate how your results <br />compare to national benchmarks. <br />Benchmark comparisons often are used for performance measurement. Communities use the <br />comparative information to help interpret their own citizen survey results, to create or revise <br />community plans, to evaluate the success of policy or budget decisions and to measure local <br />government performance. Taking the pulse of the community has little meaning without knowing what <br />pulse rate is too high and what is too low. When surveys of service satisfaction turn up "good" citizen <br />evaluations, jurisdictions need to know how others rate their services to understand if "good" is good <br />enough. Furthermore, in the absence of national or peer community comparisons, a jurisdiction is left <br />with comparing its fire protection rating to its street maintenance rating. That comparison is unfair. <br />Streets always lose to fire. More important and harder questions need to be asked; for example, how do <br />residents' ratings of fire service compare to opinions about fire service in other communities? <br />A police department that provides the fastest and most efficient service — one that closes most of its <br />cases, solves most of its crimes and keeps the crime rate low — still has a problem to fix if the perception <br />of residents in the community it intends to protect is not so strong. The benchmark data can help that <br />police department — or any department — to understand how well citizens think it is doing. Without the <br />comparative data, it would be like bowling in a tournament without knowing what the other teams are <br />scoring. NRC recommends that citizen opinion be used in conjunction with other sources of data about <br />budget, personnel and politics to help managers know how to respond to comparative results. <br />NRC's database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in <br />surveys from over 500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The NCS. <br />The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community; most <br />communities conduct surveys every year or in alternating years. NRC adds the latest results quickly <br />upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The Basic Service includes <br />national benchmark comparisons. If you chose a custom benchmarks comparison as an additional <br />service to the basic NCS, these comparison will appear in this appendix, as well. <br />Jurisdictions in the benchmark database are distributed geographically across the country and range <br />from small to large in population size. Data come from tens of thousands of individual evaluations of <br />community quality, service delivery and engagement. Despite the differences in jurisdiction <br />characteristics, all are in the business of facilitating a high quality of life for residents, typically by <br />providing local government services to residents. Though individual jurisdiction circumstances, <br />resources and practices vary, the objective virtually everywhere is to help create and sustain highly <br />livable communities. <br />Where Benchmarks Come From <br />NRC has been leading the strategic use of surveys for local governments since 1991, when the principals <br />of the company wrote the first edition of what became the classic text on citizen surveying. In Citizen <br />Surveys: how to do them, how to use them, what they mean, published by ICMA, not only were the <br />principles for quality survey methods articulated, but both the idea of benchmark data for citizen <br />opinion and the method for gathering benchmark data were pioneered. The argument for benchmarks <br />was called "In Search of Standards." "What has been missing from a local government's analysis of its <br />survey results is the context that school administrators can supply when they tell parents how an 8o <br />percent score on the social studies test compares to test results from other school systems..." <br />12 <br />