My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/19/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2004
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/19/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:49:39 AM
Creation date
2/17/2004 10:31:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/19/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Other Continued <br /> <br />With the recognition that staff'output and other resources are being maximized, gaining additional .capacity <br />by increased efficiencies requires contemporary tracking and analytical tools. These will enable the department <br />to work harder and smarter. In addition, systems need to be put in place to lessen the risk of losing the <br />"braintrust" of the organization through retirement, since this is a contributing factor in orgardza'rional <br />inefficiency. Critical 'knowledge could be lost because if no system is in place to capture it. T-he management <br />system needs to remain in place as the xvorkforce changes. <br /> <br />· Trail Signage Program .... <br /> ':~ <br /> <br />One of the more important communication tools is a <br />comprehensive signage program that is carried uniformly <br />throughout the trail system. The signage should provide a consistent <br />message to trail visitors, and provide information on trail names, <br />directions to features, general information, rules, ecological <br />stewardship programs, and interpretive information. Section 6 <br />features various types of signage that could be considered for a <br />signage pro,am. Concepts range from less expensive xvirh low <br />durabilit}, to more expensive with high durability. <br /> <br />· Americans xvith DisabLLities Act (ADA) Guidelines <br /> <br />Various trail cross sections and'routes have been illustrated in this document. Trails are designed for the <br />people, but what types of peo~ole? It is important to consider all user t3-pes when planning new trails and <br />upgrading existing trails. Municipalities have a responsibility (morally as well as legally) to provide a <br />reasonable level of accessibility (to parks and programs) for individuals xvith varying levels of ability. To <br />help this happen, the federal government has established laws that mandate designs that promote equal <br />access to all users of public (and private) facilities and programs. Although not completely tested in park <br />settings, the basic intent of the act is dear: reasonable, equal access opportunities must be provided to <br />those with disabilities. <br /> <br />There are no requirements within the ADA that mandate any spatial requirements relative to the size of <br />any particular type of park and recreation facility. The act does, however, mandate that park areas and <br />facilities be reasonably accessible and usable to al/populations. The extent to which compliance with the <br />act will impact the size or configuration of a particular facility is unlikely. Specific design guidelines may <br />have to be incorporated into the design in response to the act. <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.