Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # <br /> <br />SUNWOOD DRIVE UTILITY CONDUIT <br /> By: Leonard Linton, Civil Engineer II <br /> <br />BackgroUnd: <br /> <br />The City has received a request to install 6" PVC utility conduit along both sides of <br />Sunwood~Drive through Ramsey Town Center. Hakanson Anderson is preparing the <br />State Aidl.plans for Sunwood Drive and was asked to prepare a cost estimate. <br /> <br />Observation: <br /> <br />Staff has reviewed the estimate and evaluated the potential value of these condui(s,,,The,, <br />premise for installing the conduits is reduced excavation in the right of way. This conduit <br />would eaery either underground electric or telephone and cable but not both. Electrical <br />lines cannot be in the same conduit as other cables. The initial review of the idea is <br />positive, !he potential for not digging up the right of way is appealing. Further review is <br />not so positive. The cost for these conduits is $94,000, with an additional $17,250 to :add <br />a 3" conduit to the same trench. This would allow for installation of telephone/cabl'e'and <br />electrical ilines in conduit. Manholes are planned at a maximum 400 foot spacing and at <br />street crossings. Excavations will have to be made between manholes to facilitate <br />connection to the individual bUildings. Pre-planning the service locations and installing a <br />manhole at each location is not feasible. Building design and layout governs where the <br />optimal service locations are inevitably pre-placed service locations need to be moved. <br />The city could use the conduits for its own purposes if it had a street light utility or <br />wanted to. interconnect traffic signals. Presently the only traffic signal in Ramsey Town <br />Center is going in at Sunwood and Rhinestone. The city does not have a mechanism in <br />place to recover its costs if private utilities were allowed to use the conduits. Setting up <br />the code necessary to allow the city to charge for the use of the conduit would take time <br />and additional legal counsel expense. <br /> <br />Small underground utilities make extensive use of directional drilling with minimal <br />disruption of the fight of way. The pits used for accessing the directionally drilled <br />utilities are about the same size as excavations necessary to access the conduit and <br />directional drilling costs are strictly the utility company's responsibility. The city does <br />not have an immediate need for conduit in the fight of way. Installation of the conduit <br />would provide a free benefit to the small utilities since a cost recovery mechanism is not <br />in place t0 allow the city to charge for this benefit. <br /> <br />Staff recommends against proceeding with the installation of conduit on both sides of <br />Sunwood:'drive in. conjunction with the construction of the State Aid Project: <br /> <br /> <br />