11/20/91 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Ram.sex. She mlkect v,'~th him and .stated that if ne is not fully disabled, mc t~enefl~ will not De tulix paid. He answered t~at he v`'as mrmg ali the work out and' that he would keep her posted of situation, which he did not. Boardmember Pearson inquired if it is the doctor who determines if someone is eligible for Worker's Compensation. Mrs. Helling replied it is the doctor and also the individual assigned to the Worker's Compensation case. Further the City has just been advised that Mr. Guimont's Worker's Compensation benefits have been discontinued by the carrier effective May 1, 1991. She added that Mr. Guimont had an opportunity tochallenge the decision which he did not. She stated he received compensation until August 1, 1991 and the consequence of that is he has been overpaid. Boardmember Sharp asked if the money is reclaimed. Mrs. Helling stated she is not involved in that part of it and therefore couldn't answer that question. Mr. McKnight stated the Board should keep in mind that at the time of Mr. Guimont's accident, the fire fighters were under the impression that they would be compensated in a fashion to still be able to survive. Mr. Guimont has children, a house, etc. Mr. Guimont was in the dark about his financial support from the Cit,,,. Due to his accident, the benefit plan is nov,, going in the righ~ direction and thanks to Chief Griffin and others, the fire fighters have better benefits nov,,. If the.'.' didn't no one c0uldafford to be a volunteer fire fighter and t~e that chance. Mrs. Helling stated that Worker's Compensation, based on a salaried fire fighter's income, would not have provided replacement income to several of the fire fighters while in Jay's case, his income was provided. Boardmember Sharp questioned why this issue is in front of the Fire Board for review. Mrs. Helling replied that City Council has asked this be reviewed by thc Board to make a recon'n'nendation to City Council. Boardmember Kapler stated he read the case last night and he feels he is a little biased. He's not sure if going by what the insurance companies say is the fight way to go. He stated the fire fighters were blind Sided with the benefit package. He added that he feels he does not have enough information in :front of him to be able to make a recommendation as to the right thing to do. He doesn't know for sure if Mr. Guimont is asking for payment until Ma>,, 199t or a continuation of benefit payment. 5/L,'s. Helling stated that as to what Mr. Guimont is asking, under an.',' provisions of any policy, all r,..noney would iiave stopped as of Ma,,, 1, 1991. /7~o~a'rdmember Sharp stated that regarding qualifvin~ under the present prom-am, he feels Mr. Guimont is not: however, he reiterated that the 5~re' fighters were not aware of ~/hat was available. ~,,~stated that Mr. Guimont is as 'l. dn~ for the ney` pro~o'mm to ~et dollars ahead. Personnel Coordinator McAlonev commented that the reason for Mrs. Helling reviewing the income Tax Return is so it didn't become public information. Councilmcmber Cich stated that Mrs. Helling was asked to review the returns as she is the mos~ qualified person to do so. He stated it was unfortunate what happened to lX, h'. Guimont: however, it did "v`,ake everybody up" with regard to benefits. Ms. McAloney stated that in fairness to everyone, the information regarding the benefits wasn't readily available. Fire Board/August 28. 199I Page 3 of ~