My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/10/1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1991
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/10/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 10:19:43 AM
Creation date
2/19/2004 11:42:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/10/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 IN 40 LEGISLaTION/METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley reported the FHA has ]ssue~ a notice that they will <br />continue to do spot appraisals In financing residential housing, <br />though they will no longer be giving consideration of the 4 In 40 <br />rural density. The committee Is still holding on the 4 In 40 rural <br />density, though there have been other criteria Introduced such as <br />regulrlng two septic systems to be built on one lot. He noted that <br />there will be new appointments to the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />Councllmember Cich stated he has written to Governor-Elect Car]son <br />expressing his opinion on home rule and the Metropolitan Council, <br />though he has not had a reply. He expressed his ~lsp]easure with <br />the direction being taken by the elected State officials. <br /> <br />Deputy Mayor Peterson explained the City's policy has been that the <br />zoning and development laws should be the jurisdiction of the local <br />government, that Ramsey Is not going to prematurely need to bring <br />sewer into the City, and that the 4 In 40 requirement Is not needed <br />in the City. They are basically back to looking at 2 i/2-acre lots <br />in the rural area. Mr. Harte]y thought It may not be wlse to have <br />2 1/2-acre lots In areas that will ultimately be sewered because It <br />would basically stop the expansion of the urban area. The City <br />might look at lO-acre parcels in areas that wl]l be serviced and <br />2 1/2-acre lots in areas that wi]] remain rural. <br /> <br />Deputy Mayor Peterson suggested the Item can be discussed <br />greater Oetal) at a future meeting. <br /> <br />LANDFILL: TIPPING FEES. ETC. <br /> <br />Deputy Mayor Peterson explained that unless Waste Management <br />reaches a particular volume, they will pay the tipping fee as <br />scheduled. Mr. Hart]ey stated he just received notice that Waste <br />Management has raised their rates back to their previous ]eve]s, so <br />they have more or ]ess abandoned the tipping fee reduction. The <br />City Is receiving that fee. Deputy Mayor Peterson explained the <br />volume is way mown because Elk Rlver underbid them again, and <br />because the amount of raw garbage going into it is down due to <br />~ecyc]lng. Mr. Hart]ey said at that rate of fill, the capacity <br />they have licensed for will keep the landfill open for many years. <br /> <br />Deputy Mayor Peterson noted the agreements and Conditional Use <br />Permits that have been entered into that the new Counci]members may <br />want to review. Those documents specifically asked for were 1) the <br />purchase agreement, 2) the vertical expansion Special Use Permit, <br />3) the agreements with Anoka County for licensing, and 4) items <br />having to do with the State. <br /> <br />SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL/DECEMBER 5, lg90 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.