My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/14/1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1991
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/14/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 10:19:48 AM
Creation date
2/19/2004 11:45:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/14/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From : DRL <br /> <br />Nov. 28.1989 10:11 PM <br /> <br />Pi3 <br /> <br />126. Would you favor or oppose the <br /> construction of a Community <br /> C~nter in Elk River? (WAIT <br /> FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel <br /> strongly that way? <br /> <br />STRONGLY FAVOR .......... <br />FAVOR ................... <br />OPPOSE...~ .............. 3 <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE ......... 4 <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 <br /> <br />A bond.referendum would be required to pay for its construction <br />and partial operating costs. User fees would also underwrite the <br />operation of the community center to some extent. <br /> <br />127. How much would you be willing to <br /> PaY in additional property taxes <br /> tO support the construction and <br /> partial operation of an Elk River <br /> Community Center? (START WITH A <br /> RANDOMLY SELECTED CHOICE FROM ~1 <br /> TO #8) Let's say, would you be <br /> walling to pay $__ per year? <br /> (MOVE TO NEXT CHOICE UP OR DOWN <br /> DEPZNDING ON ANSWER.) <br /> <br />NOTHING ................. <br />$25 ..................... 2 <br />$50 ..................... <br />$75 ..................... <br />$100 .................... 5 <br />$125 .................... 6 <br />$150 .................... 7 <br />$175 ................. ...8 <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 9 <br /> <br />The City currently has saved funds for the construction of a new <br />City ~all. If a community center were built .... <br /> <br />128. WOuld you favor or oppose attach- <br /> i~g the new City ~all to the <br /> Community Center and combining <br /> the construction of both facil- <br /> ities? <br /> <br />FAVOR ................... <br />OPPOSE .................. 2 <br />DON'T CARE (VOL) ........ 3 <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 <br /> <br />Based o~ our previous dlzcussion of the facilities which could be <br />offered: in the center, please tell me how many members of this <br />household would probably .... <br /> <br />t29. visit the Community Center on a <br /> frequent, at least weekly, basis? <br /> <br />130. Visit the Community Center on an <br /> occasional, perhaps monthly, basis? <br /> <br />If a community center were built, the City would face two choices <br />on charging user fees. First, the City could subsidize the <br />operation of the center through general tax revenue and keep user <br />fees loW. Or, second, the City could require the facility to be <br />self-sufficient, requiring much higher user fees. <br /> <br />131. Which course of action would you <br /> favor -- should the City subsi- <br /> dize operating costs through gen- <br /> eral tax revenues or nct? <br /> <br />SUBSIDIZE ............... ! <br />DON'T SUBSIDIZE ......... 2 <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 <br /> <br />To cover the operating costs of the Community Cen~er, the City <br />may charge moderate fees to facility users, in this way, <br />operating expenses incurred by the City could be decreased. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.