My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/04/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/04/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:21:44 AM
Creation date
12/5/2014 9:51:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/04/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Strategies to Improve Communities <br />Ratings of Snow Removal Service Compared by Year <br />years prior to <br />current <br />Average rating (0=poor, 33=fair, 66=good, 100=excellent) <br />Current <br />-2 <br />-3 <br />-5 <br />-6 <br />-8 <br />-10 <br />Snow removal <br />on major <br />streets 64 69 67 62 65 65 63 61 <br />Although ratings for snow removal in other places <br />were, on average, not as good as Longmont's ratings, <br />Longmont managers wondered if residents' <br />perspectives about snow removal were influenced by <br />widespread disagreement with snow removal policy. <br />In the policy exploration survey following the <br />"current" year of the general survey, National <br />Research Center asked residents about the policy <br />that might have the biggest impact on overall ratings <br />of snow removal. Given that big storms tend to most <br />influence ratings of snow removal, the question <br />asked if residents supported or opposed the policy of <br />forbidding parking on plow routes during a snow <br />emergency. <br />To what extent do you agree or disagree that during a declared <br />snow emergency, the City of Longmont should implement and <br />enforce a no parking policy along the approved snow plow <br />routes in order to more efficiently plow the streets? <br />Percent <br />Strongly agree <br />Somewhat agree <br />Somewhat disagree <br />Strongly disagree <br />Total <br />65% <br />28% <br />4% <br />2% <br />100% <br />The vast majority of residents supported the policy, <br />so no change has been planned. Although discovery <br />that residents support the no -parking policy is <br />unlikely to raise ratings, had policy makers <br />unilaterally rescinded the policy and permitted <br />parking on plow routes during big snow storms, <br />those above average ratings likely would not have <br />sustained <br />For years, residents had been giving strong ratings to <br />the overall quality of life in Longmont. City <br />management and elected officials were interested in <br />understanding what components of the community <br />influenced those ratings. So following the biennial <br />general citizen survey, the exploration survey sought <br />deeper insight into community quality of life. <br />How would you rate your overall quality of life in Longmont? <br />Percent <br />Excellent <br />Good <br />Fair <br />Poor <br />Total <br />21% <br />59% <br />18% <br />2% <br />100% <br />In a question without response options, residents, in <br />their own words, offered what they found to be most <br />© 2014, National Research Center, Inc. <br />appealing about life in Longmont. Results were as <br />follows: <br />Location <br />Quality of life in general <br />Affordable cost of living <br />Close to family/friends <br />Natural environment <br />Recreational opportunities <br />Close to work <br />My neighbors/neighborhood <br />Sense of community <br />Dining opportunities <br />Schools <br />Downtown Longmont <br />Shopping <br />Other <br />52% <br />- 48% <br />48% <br />46% <br />40% <br />39% <br />39% <br />38% <br />31% <br />28% <br />24% <br />17% <br />16% <br />By learning what mattered most to residents of the <br />community, local leaders are able to protect what <br />seems to keep Longmont attractive — e.g. <br />affordability and the environment — and to build on <br />those aspects of community that may not yet be <br />reasons to love life there (e.g. shopping and the <br />downtown). <br />Performance Measurement <br />Most government performance measurement <br />systems collect and report data that already reside in <br />administrative filing cabinets and on file servers. <br />Beyond the use of these "hard" measures, the <br />assessment of relative performance success should <br />also include residents' attitudes about the delivery of <br />services and the qualities of the community that are <br />meant to improve (in part) because of great services. <br />Along with crime rates or road repair, assessments <br />should include residents' evaluations of the <br />effectiveness of local policing and the quality of <br />community mobility. Going beyond administrative <br />records to track performance tells local leaders how <br />well a city or county is meeting its vision of success. <br />The same survey that assessed community strengths <br />and needs can be used to reevaluate a community at <br />a later date. The NCS and other broad citizen surveys <br />are intended not only to serve as a community needs <br />assessment but also as a systematic performance <br />monitoring tool. Many communities now use survey <br />results in their performance measurement systems. <br />The City of Westminster, Colorado and the City of <br />Littleton, Colorado are great examples of <br />Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.