My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/06/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/06/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:21:37 AM
Creation date
12/5/2014 10:44:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/06/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
believed that the City's density goals and reduced surface parking would be achieved even if the <br />FAR were slightly reduced. <br />Commissioner VanScoy believed the original intention for The COR-1 would be changed if the <br />FAR were amended. <br />Chairperson Levine stated it was hard to visualize how the project would look with only <br />preliminary site plans. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill commented staff could report back to the Commission <br />with more detailed plans. <br />Commissioner Brauer suggested that the plans include a 0.75 and 0.65 FAR. <br />Commissioner VanScoy questioned if the 0.65 FAR could be required until it was necessary to <br />have a 0.75 FAR. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill suggested the Commission move forward with a <br />contingent recommendation while staff worked to create better artistic renditions on the site plans. <br />He discussed how staff would continue to work to achieve the Commission's goals for The COR- <br />1. <br />Commissioner Nosan reported there was a need for market rate apartments in Ramsey. She <br />questioned why a ramp was necessary. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated this was a previous policy decision, which <br />required structured parking versus surface parking. If the density requirements were altered or <br />reduced, this would negate the need for shared structured parking. He further discussed the land <br />use goals for The COR-1 with the Commission. He asked if the Commission was comfortable <br />moving forward with the amended FAR, which would reduce the requirements for structured <br />parking. <br />Commissioner Brauer questioned if the City would have gotten the rail station if the FAR were set <br />at 0.65. However, now that the City had the station, it could step back and evaluate its density <br />levels. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill did not believe the City received funding based solely <br />on the established FAR, but rather on the number of proposed housing units. <br />Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner Nosan, to recommend that City <br />Council adopt Ordinance #14-14 amending Minimum Floor Area Ratio requirements in the COR- <br />1 Sub -District, directing staff to bring back draft plans prior to final approval by the City Council. <br />Further discussion <br />Commissioner VanScoy did not support the proposed amendment to the FAR. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.