Laserfiche WebLink
Park and Recreation Commission <br />Meeting Date: 11/13/2014 <br />Submitted For: Mark Riverblood, Engineering/Public Works <br />By: MaryJo Warner, Engineering/Public Works <br />5. 1. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />2015 — 2019 PARKS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to recommend the 2015 — 2019 Parks' Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to City Council. <br />The document outlines a 5 -year plan similar to the previous 2014 — 2018 plan, with the last year (2019) also <br />functioning as a `place -holder' for park projects with uncertain time -lines, or unidentified funding such as grants <br />and Park Dedication fees paid by developers. <br />Additionally, projects (like the playground at Elmcrest Park) that were not completed in 2014, but begun, are <br />shown for completion and payment this coming year. <br />Notification: <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Parks 5 — Year CIP will be adopted by Council as part of the larger CIP document, usually corresponding to <br />the General Fund budget in December. <br />The following is an excerpt from the anticipated larger city-wide all -category CIP, and includes an explanation on <br />the CIP document and process: <br />"Enclosed is the Ramsey Capital Improvements/Capital Outlay Plan (CIP) for the years 2015-2019. It has been <br />prepared in an attempt to anticipate major capital expenditures in advance of the year in which they are budget <br />requests. Further, several projects may interrelate or require other improvements prior to initiation, which would <br />cause delays without prior planning. Additionally, projects may require budgeting over several years or receipt of <br />funds from other sources (i.e. grants) requiring planning completion prior to the funding year. Finally, the plan <br />enables a snapshot of the identified capital needs of the community allowing for continual prioritization of these <br />needs. <br />Approval of the CIP by Council does not authorize spending or initiation of a given project. It does, however, <br />provide a guide for the community for a whole array of private and public decision-making, impacted by public <br />capital expenditures. Therefore, the CIP should receive ratification only if the Council perceives actions <br />contemplated within the plan as reasonable and planned within justified time frames. It shall further be noted that <br />initial project design of public infrastructure projects identified within this plan often begins two years or more <br />prior to the date of construction. <br />The CIP is not intended to provide for precise budgeting. Capital costs are projected as estimates. Upon each <br />update of the plan, deletions, additions, delays, or other revisions may occur, reflecting changing community needs. <br />These changes allow for budget refinements as a particular project nears actual construction." <br />Because future years' of the CIP consist of many variables, staff recommends a discussion of the various values and <br />details associated with each project within 2015; and a brief, summary mention of future years' projects for <br />2016-19. <br />