My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 11/18/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 11/18/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:28:28 PM
Creation date
12/5/2014 11:12:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
11/18/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />• Special assessments are generally a dependable source of revenue. <br />• Special assessments are a means of raising money outside city debt and <br />general property taxes. (Special assessment bonds do not count toward <br />statutory debt limitations). <br />• Special assessments provide a means of levying charges for public <br />services against property otherwise exempt from taxation. <br />• Special assessments lower the cost to the community of bringing <br />undeveloped land into urban use. <br />• Charging the property owner for the benefit received prevents or <br />minimizes the possibility that a property owner will reap a financial <br />profit from the improvement at the expense of the general taxpayer. <br />Disadvantages of special assessment financing include: <br />• The difficulty and expense in establishing the special benefit to the <br />property. <br />• The difficulties in special assessment administration. The administrative <br />procedures require careful execution in order to avoid litigation. <br />• Cities have at times used special assessments to pay for premature public <br />improvements. Because the city generally bears some of the cost of <br />every public improvement, land speculators sometimes urge councils to <br />do unjustifiable special assessment programs. <br />• The availability of special assessment financing often tempts city <br />officials to underwrite the cost of governmental programs that should be <br />an obligation of the entire city. <br />• Unless special assessments conform to a city's long-term financial and <br />capital improvement plans, they can subject a city to two serious <br />financial dangers. First, if a city frequently undertakes special <br />assessment bond issues backed by the full faith and credit of a city in an <br />unplanned manner, city credit might be overextended. This leads to <br />higher interest charges on all city and school district borrowing and <br />increases the possibility of default. Second, placing too heavy a burden <br />on individual property owners (with special assessments and regular <br />property taxes) runs the risk of increasing tax delinquencies and <br />potentially jeopardizes a city's credit and borrowing position. <br />• From the council's point of view, the public's reaction to a proposed <br />special assessment might be the most important determinative factor. <br />While taxpayer resistance is usually minimal, this is not true in every <br />instance. Special assessment programs receive much greater public <br />support if the council adequately informs people of its intentions to make <br />the improvement, the benefit the improvements will provide, and the <br />necessary financial demands. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 9/22/2011 <br />Special Assessment Guide Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.