Laserfiche WebLink
for assessment methods. Staff was then directed to bring the draft Policy to a future City Council Work Session for <br />review and input from the full Council. <br />October 14th - City Council reviews the draft Special Assessments Policy at work session and provides additional <br />comments for incorporation into the draft policy for consideration at a future work session. <br />November 18th - City Council reviews the draft Special Assessments Policy at work session and provides <br />additional comments for incorporation into the draft policy based on input from City Attorney Langel and Mr. <br />Jason Messner of Patchin, Messner and Dodd, a firm specializing in real estate appraisals. Based on their input, <br />Staff was directed to provide Policy language allowing Council to order appraisal consultations on improvement <br />projects as needed to help verify that the amount of the special assessments will not exceed the benefit to the <br />property. As discussed, typical fees for special benefit consultations range from $5,000 to $7,000 depending on the <br />type and scope of the public improvement project. <br />Attached is a clean copy of the final draft of the Special Assessments Policy addressing all comments received from <br />the Public Works Committee and City Council. A track changes version of the attached Policy will be available at <br />the meeting for review if needed. <br />Notification: <br />No notification was required for this case. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations: <br />It is important to note that the attached draft Special Assessments Policy complies fully with our City Charter <br />requirements related to special assessments. The City Attorney has reviewed the draft Policy to ensure it has both <br />the proper legal form and that it conforms to the special assessment requirements outlined in Chapter 8 of the City <br />Charter, which is attached for reference. <br />Section 6 of the attached draft Policy addresses the three special conditions that the City Council felt would be <br />appropriate for the City to cover all costs for to prevent property owners from paying special assessments on <br />improvements they could not possibly foresee. The three conditions include subgrade corrections to replace <br />unsuitable underlying soils, converting rural streets to urban streets by filling in ditches and adding curb and gutter <br />and storm sewer, and oversizing existing City streets by either widening or increasing the load carrying capacity of <br />the pavement section. <br />Section 10 of the draft Policy addresses the fact that special assessments levied against medium to higher density <br />single-family properties roughly one-third acre or smaller will likely not exceed the benefit to the property if <br />assessed 25% of project costs. However, if 25% of project costs are levied against lower density single-family <br />properties greater than one-third acre or so the assessments may exceed the benefit to the property. And as the <br />property area increases, so do the chances that a special assessment of 25% of the project costs will exceed the <br />benefit to the property since there are fewer properties to spread project costs across. Therefore, allowing for the use <br />of benefit appraisals and appraisal consultations is important considering that a majority of single-family residential <br />properties in Ramsey are lower density. <br />Since the first street reconstruction projects will occur in areas with lower density single-family properties, staff will <br />be recommending the use of benefit appraisal consultations with these projects. Attached is a figure showing the <br />higher density residential urban properties throughout Ramsey (see shaded properties) that will likely allow the use <br />of 25% assessments when reconstructing abutting City streets. All other properties will likely not realize enough <br />benefit to allow for the use of 25% assessments and will therefore require benefit appraisal consultations as <br />approved by Council. <br />When developing the draft Policy, special assessment policies from numerous other cities were obtained and <br />reviewed. These cities included Andover, Blaine and Champlin, among others. Attached is a tabulation of some of <br />the more pertinent assessment information gathered from other cities policies. <br />