Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The Plan should fully incorporate the recommendations of the "A" -Minor Arterial System <br />Evaluation Report into the TPP and document the key "A" -Minor and Non -Freeway Principal <br />Arterial needs and funding gaps. <br />Regional Highway System Needs <br />The current revenue scenario plan predominantly focuses on MnPASS and preservation for <br />the regional highway system and has limited vision related to strategic capacity <br />enhancements. It would be extremely helpful for our planning if a scenario that allowed for <br />additional transportation improvements (specifically highway projects) was analyzed. As the <br />Plan is now, we cite the following concerns regarding the regional highway system. <br />• There is not enough detail about the Principal Arterial needs in the region. <br />• The regional highway needs identified in the additional revenue scenario and the <br />needs beyond the increased revenue scenario are inadequate. <br />• There is no inventory of the multitude of investments needed on the regional <br />highway system. <br />• The plan does not adequately explain the regional funding needs. <br />• The plan does not account for non-traditional, federal, and state funded programs <br />and projects. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The TPP should include a comprehensive vision for the regional highway system. This vision <br />should not be constrained to funding within 2040 and it should describe what should happen <br />in the region to address the majority of projected deficiencies. In addition to the two funding <br />scenarios contained in the TPP, a scenario that assumes a higher amount of funding for <br />highways should be added and analyzed to better identify the level of improvements <br />necessary to achieve a satisfactory level of mobility in 2040. <br />Reaion's Travel Management Organizations (TMO) <br />The TPP contains minimal information on the TMOs operating within our region. In reviewing <br />the 500-plus page document, there are less than 1.5 pages of information on the four <br />individual TMOs, which includes Commute -Solutions operated in Anoka County. <br />The lack of information on these important organizations within the TPP is concerning. One <br />of the central questions asked of TMOs is what are they and who they represent. This is a <br />question even asked by people in the transportation field, many of whom are the readers of <br />this document. To not provide information on these individual organizations within this <br />document is a discredit to their important role in the transportation system. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />We suggest that the Met Council insert a map of the region that identifies the coverage areas <br />for each of the TMOs. The inclusion of Information for each of the TMOs is also <br />recommended, <br />