Laserfiche WebLink
Amendment:c[~ried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, <br />Hendriksen, La. Due and Thomd. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Bawden. <br /> <br />Motion carriedi~ Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, Hendriksen, <br />LaDue and ThOrud~ Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Bawden. <br /> <br />Motion by commissioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to amend #29 to read <br />"The Applicanl states that oil from the transmission and engine disassembly operations will be <br />hauled by an a~thorized waste oil recycler. <br /> <br />Motion carrie& Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Terry, Deemer, Hendriksen, <br />LaDue and ThOrud. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Bawden. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #34 to read <br />"That the propCsed use will not substantially...". <br /> <br />Motion carried~ Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, Hendriksen, <br />LaDue and ThOrud. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Bawden. <br /> <br />Motion by commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Thorud to amend #35 to read <br />"That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous...". <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Deemer, Thorud, <br />Hendfiksen~ LaDue and Terry. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Bawden. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #36 to read <br />"That the proposed use will be harmonious with...". <br /> <br />Motion carried~ Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, Hendriksen, <br />LaDue and Th°rud. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Bawden. <br /> <br />Motion by commissioner Thorud and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to amend #37 to read <br />"That the proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be <br />harmonious ar~d appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general <br />vicinity and will not change the essential character of the area. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Commissioner Hendriksen stated that the design being proposed doesn't <br />appear to be Consistent with the requirements and inquired if the Commission was planning to <br />modify this d~ng the site plan discussion to be harmonious. Discussion ensued regarding what is <br />allowed in B-~ zoning and I-1. Commissioner Deemer noted heavy manufacturing companies <br />and outside s~orage currently exist in the area.. Commissioner Hendriksen pointed out the <br />problem with :the :accessory structure size and stated that it also is not consistent. Chairman <br />Zimmerman Stated that the Findings should address the proposed use, not the buildings. <br />Commissione~ Hendriksen stated that his point is that the proposal received is not harmonious. <br />Commissioner La_Due stated that by saying it will be harmonious regardless of what he is <br />proposing, is gaying that it will be made to be harmonious. Commissioner Hendriksen stated that <br />the design tht~s far does not meet the requirements to be consistent with the B-W Zoning and <br />suggested adding a new findings of fact accordingly. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Thorud, Deemer, <br />Hendriksen, LaDue and Terry. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Bawden. <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Commission/March 21, 1991 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />