Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Frolik stat~,d ~at some of the Riverside West residents present at the public hearing, expressed <br />concern with ~gard to City utilities. <br />Mr. Doug F°gntain, 15255 Garnet Street N.W., Ramsey - inquired how Faye Construction <br />proposes to ectntrol a private recreational facility in Outlot F and a public recreational facility in <br />Outlot E. <br /> <br />Mr. Chapman replied that an agreement would have to be worked out and pos.sibly fencing would <br />be the answer. .- Mr. Chapman stated he is recommending approval of the rezonmg to be contingent <br />on the final pl~ as filed. <br /> <br />City Engineer Sankowski stated that out of 17 items listed in his review letter, the 10 which remain <br />unresolved sh~ld be resolved at the final plat stage. He added that because the park plan has been <br />modified, it Sl~ould once again return to the Park and Recreation Commission for review. He <br />commented th&t substantial park area has been reserved for a drainage easement and any area of a <br />park used for ~ge cannot be counted as parkland for dedication purposes. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik sta :t~l that ff the preliminary plat as approved, at as appropriate to antroduce the ordinance <br />to amend rezofiing boundaries to coincide with the preliminary plat at this time and delay adoption <br />of the ordinance until the final plat is recorded. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich fnoted that if the final rezoning description varies from the legal description in the <br />hearing nofieei~the.City will have to hold another public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion by C0uneilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to approve the <br />preliminary pl.~t of Faye 2nd Addition contingent upon compliance with the City Engineer's review <br />letter dated l~e~marY 28, 1991 and favorable reviews from all reviewing agencies and the City of <br />Ramsey Park and Recreation Commission. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer and Hardin. <br />Voting No: NOne. Absent: Councilmember Cieh. <br /> <br />Case #3: iRequest to Amend the Business and Residential District Zoning <br /> iboUndaries in the Proposed Plat of Faye 2nd Addition; Case of Faye <br /> :Construction <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik staged that Faye 2nd Addition is proposed to be developed with commercial activity <br />adjacent to Highway #10 and single family residential development south to the Mississippi River. <br />However, Fay~ Construction has requested a rezoning to realign the district boundary between the <br />commercial afl~l residential portions of the property to coincide with the preliminary plat submitted <br />for approval. Ms. Frolik suggested City Council review the proposed findings of fact and noted <br />that #3, 2nd pg~'agraph should read B-3/B-2 instead of just B-3. <br />Motion by Cornel!member Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to adopt Resolution <br />#91-04-085 adopting Findings of Fact #0294, as corrected, relating to Faye Construction's request <br />for a rezonmg of the business and res~dennal areas m the proposed plat of Faye 2nd Addiuon. <br /> <br />Motion carrie~. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer and Hardin. <br />Voting No: Nbne. Absent: Councilmember Cich. <br /> <br />Motion by C0unoilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to introduce <br />Ordinance ~9 lr. XX to amend the business and residential zoning boundaries in the proposed plat of <br />Faye 2nd Ad~tion. <br /> <br />City Council/April 23, 1991 <br /> Page 7 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />