My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
07/16/91 Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
07/16/91 Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 9:17:59 AM
Creation date
2/20/2004 10:36:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission - Special
Document Date
07/16/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
illustr~ed for that area which would service traffic into the maintenance and storage areas. <br />Past p61icies have required developments to have all traveled drive areas hard-surface <br />paved,r Therefore, I would recommend that bituminous surfacing be extended to include <br />the are~ designatezl as grave] drive and parking on the submission. In addition, there is no <br />concre~ curb and gutter specified on this plan. It has been past policy to require concrete <br />curb ~nd gutter to encompass all paved areas. Recently, on a heavy industrial <br />development, we relaxed the policy and required that curb and gutter only be installed up to <br />the frof~t building line. The Planning and Zoning Commission should determine the extent <br />to which concrete curb should be required on this plan. At a minimum, however, curb and <br />gutl~m' should be requirext up to thc front building line to be consistent with past policies. <br /> <br /> '" Performance standards require one parking space per 200 square feet of <br />~~e. The size office designated would require 9.2 spaces. Additionally, there is a <br />maintet~ance area and I am uncertain as to whether that area will house full-time employees. <br />If so, 8ddifional parking should be provided. The site plan shows seven spaces being <br />propose~d. The standard suggests the number of spaces proposed will not be sufficient. <br />Either i~dditional stalls should be provided or documentation should be provided detailing <br />the number of employees and visitors that can be expected at this facility. <br /> <br />Landseatfine Plan: The plan submitted shows six plantings of some sort are to be <br />provid~l albng the wall of the office facing the sn'eet. The type and size of these plantings <br />should? obviously be specified. In addition, the Commission may want to consider <br />additiohal landscaping between the parking lot and 153rd Avenue N.W. <br /> <br />Architectural Standards: The exterior finish on all sides of the building is to be <br />stucco,r' This is in conformance with the architectural standards. <br /> <br />I recommend the site plan be revised in accordance with the comments above. <br /> <br />Respectfully s~bmitted, <br /> <br />City Engine~ <br /> <br />SJJ/jmt <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.