My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11/05/91
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
11/05/91
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 9:19:47 AM
Creation date
2/20/2004 11:17:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
11/05/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE # 2 <br /> <br />REQUEST 'FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF WOOD <br /> CASE OF BLH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />POND HILLS; <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />BLH Development Company is requesting preliminary plat approval of Wood Pond Hills. Wood <br />Pond Hills consists of approximately 72 acres proposed to be subdivided into 135 lots. The plat is <br />proposed to be developed and four phases and it will be served by municipal sewer and water. <br />The 12 northernmost lots are not within the MUSA; however, this area is expected to be included <br />in the MUSA by the time the lots are developed. <br /> <br />You might recall, that when the Commission first reviewed this plat in March of 1990, it was <br />proposed to beldeveloped as a Planned Unit Development. That is no longer the case. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br />b) <br />c) <br />d) <br /> <br />Site location map <br />Preliminary plat <br />Draft review letter from Tom Hovey, DNR <br />!City Staff review letter dated October 30, 1991 <br /> <br />As you will note in the Cit3, Staff review lener of the preliminary plat, there are severa~ issues to be <br />resolved. Staff is seeking the Commission's input on the following issues: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />Street proposed in Block 8 - A portion of the street proposed in Block 8 is to be property <br />that is not contained within the plat. The cleanest wax, to handle this would be to include in <br />the plat, that adjacent parcel proposing to ~ve the ad~tional street right-of-way required. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />Cul-de,sac between Block 10 and 11. The street between Block 10 and 11 would end in a <br />temporary cul-de-sac and provide for future of extension of the street into the adjacent <br />parcel.: The adjacent parcel only has a peninsula of developable land that would most likely <br />have to be developed w/th a cul-de-sac extension of the street between Block 10 and 11. <br />This c~eates a situation of ultimately having a cut-de-sac distance of 900 to 1,000 feet. <br />Should the developer consider alternative street ali~mmaents in this area to reduce the <br />ultimate length of the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Sunfish Lake Drive. This street is proposed to be developed as an MSA route to provide <br />an additional link of east/west thoroughfare in our community. The street is proposed to <br />cross a wetland area in the northwest comer of the pla~. The point of traverse is faith, wide <br />and the cost of construction in this area could be rmrfirnized somewhat if the road were <br />aligned shghtly more to the northwest at a narrow point in the wetland. <br /> <br />With respect tO park dedication, the plat was reviewed bv the Park and Recreation Commission at <br />their regular meeting in October. The consensus was that park dedication will consist of land for <br />continuation of the trail corridor and the balance will be satisfied With cash. However, the exact <br />alignment of the trail corridor through the plat has not been resolved and will be an item of <br />discussion at the November meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.