My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/24/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 02/24/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:22:11 PM
Creation date
2/20/2004 1:15:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/24/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE # <br /> <br /> REVIEW COMMERCIAL TRAIL AND PARK DEDICATION <br /> By: Leonard Linton, Civil Engineer II <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The City Cbuncil reviewed ail fees at their December 9, 2003 meeting. Staff was <br />directed to review the commercial trail and park dedication fees and forward a <br />recommend~ation to the Parks Commission. Information on commercial park dedication <br />fees was presented to the Parks Commission at the regular January meeting. The case <br />was tabled ~ith a request for more detailed information. <br /> <br />ObservatiOn: <br /> <br />Staff gather:ed information from cities that have recently performed similar analyses and <br />looked up data for cities that are in the northwest portion of the metro area. Most cities <br />do not have: a specific fee for trails; it is covered in the commercial and residential park <br />dedication ~ees. The results of this research are summarized below. The full text of the <br />searches is imt included in the packet but is available for Commissioner review. <br /> <br />Thc City °~Plymouth revised their development code relating to park dedication fees in <br />the fall of 2001 ,' The Plymouth study indicates that commercial and industrial employees <br />use the par~ and trail system for recreation during breaks, company picnics and outings <br />and empl0ygrs may sponsor teams in league team sports played on the fields, thereby <br />negating th~ argument that C/I development does not impact the park and trail system. <br />The Plym0~th review was conducted as part of the revision of the city code related to <br />development. Their review included information from the City of Bloomington that <br />indicated tl~at 90% of demand for parks comes from residents and 10% from <br />Corn inertial/Industrial employees. <br /> <br />The City of~Charaplin prepared a listing of 2003 park dedication rates. A condensed copy <br />of the Chaniplin survey is included in the packet. Shading has been added to de- <br />emphasize Communities that arc not 'comparable in size or general location to Ramsey. <br /> <br />The charge from the Ramsey City Council was to review commercial trail dedication fees <br />and indirectly the commercial park dedication fees. The current C/I trail fee is $100.00 <br />/acre. The Current park dedication fee is 5% of Fair Market Value (FMV), using $2.00/ <br />sq fi as the fiainimum for FMV. The current Industrial fee is also 5% FMV, using $1.00/ <br />sq ft as the ininirnum. Fair Market Value can be an elusive term as anyone who has <br />bought or s~ld real estate or vehicles can attest. The buyer always wants the value to be <br />low and thel. seller is looking for maximum value. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.