01/02/91 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion by ~ssioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to table Mr. Vevea's request for si~ plan review until the special Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for October 16, 1990. Further dtseussaon, The Commission consensus was that prior to the October 16, 1990 meeting, Mr. Vevea should meet with the City Engineer to review drainage plans for the property and Ms. Frolik was itas~'ueted to place Mr. Vevea's case as Item #1 on the October 16, 1990 Agenda. Motion carrie21. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, LaDue and Thorud. ¥ofing No: Commissioner Terry. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. ~ i,.DiSeussion Re~,ardin~ Possib]{: Modifications to the Procedure for ~,Process~n~ Subdivision Anolications. · Ms. Frohk re0alled that on September 4, 1990, Commissioner Deemer requested that a case be added to thc ~Cortm~issions Agenda regarding the possibility of modifying the procedure for processing sul~livision applications to require that the sketch plan be reviewed by the Park and Recreation Co'remission prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Ms. Frolik stated that requiring su~visi0ns to be first reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission would result in two months b~ing devoted to sketch plan review, which might be considered excessive since the intent of sket¢la plan is a conceptual review. Ms. Frolik stated that another concern of hers is that the Park anti l~eevoafion Commission has been charged with reviewing plats for appropriate park dedication r~q~uire~ents and the Planning and Zoning Commission should be assured that when they receive~tlie p .m. liminary plat, the recommendations of the Park and Recreation Commission will be refleoted on n. CommissionerDeemer stated that his reasons for bringing this up for discussion was his concern that preliminaj'y plats are being approved with contingencies that are never followed up on. Commissioner: Deemer stated that, in his opinion, the process either had to be modified or the Planning and Zoning Commission should be added to the final review process of a plat. Mr. Otto state4t that if the procedure is modified, then the City would be asking the Park and Recreation COmmission to review a sketch plan for park dedication without benefit of any topography information which is available at preliminary plat stage. The Commissi~)n consensus was to retain the platting procedure in its current order, knowing that if it becomes g, eceSsary, the Planning Commission can call for a preview of the preliminary plat prior to scheduling the preliminary plat public hearing. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to adjourn the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried, Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Bawden, Deemer, LaDue, Terry and Tho/'ud. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. The regular meeting adjourned at 10:13 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission/October 2, 1990 Page 7 of 8