My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/05/91
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
02/05/91
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 9:10:20 AM
Creation date
2/23/2004 8:18:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
02/05/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
therefore proViiqg tl~at the existence of this tower did not lower the property value. Mr. Monson <br />reiterated h~s l~ve f~r Mr. Rohs' house, the beauty of the neighborhood and the people, He stated <br />his new plan iW~S tO plant a screen of about twenty 20 to 30' pine trees (placed with attention to <br />beauty) all the 'WayI down the front of the property. The tower will be located behind the house <br />~ here there is a 10 [drop and also _00 distance between the back of the house and the street. He <br />stated tie v,,o~k~d this plan out after finding out on Thursday night that the neighbors didn't like <br />what he was Pr~)posjng to do. He included a diagram of this new plan and also photographs of the <br />subjec! propertl, and surrounding area. <br /> <br />Commissioneri[De~mer asked Ms. Frolik if there were any stipulations in the neighborhood's <br />covenence reg .m', ding towers. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik replied that there were no restrictions. <br /> <br />Becky Peterso,n, 15801 Traprock Street N.W., Ramsey - asked Mr. Rohs if he had anything <br />proving that Ih{ distance from the back of his house to the street is actually 300'. <br /> <br />Mr. Rohs ans~ered that he didn't have a document stating that, however, he knows that figure to <br />be very accumaX. <br /> <br />Mr. Monson sigtedlthat Mr. Rohs "stepped" the distance and came up with 295'. He added, with <br />regard to the pl}antihg of a tree screen, that if the neighbors requested it, he would buy and plant 25 <br />to 35' pine tr¢~ insiead of the original plan of 20 to 30' trees. <br /> <br />Ron Beaubienl 15855 Traprock Street N.W., Ramsey - stated he was surprised that Mr. Monson <br />was pursuing ~s pl~an when the neighborhood voted it down. <br />Mr. Monson stated !he wanted the chance to submit his new plan of tree screening to the neighbors <br />to review it. <br /> <br />Mr. Beaubien ~gain stated his surprise at Mr. Monson pursuing the tower and stated that he's been <br />a resident in R ~msCy for 11 years and what Mr. Monson is proposing is a hobby versus a lifestyle <br />and he feels th~ t factor should be taken into consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Monson al,q'ee{:l HAM radio operating is considered a hobby but there are many values to this <br />type of comm.~nicgtion. One big plus is being able to communicate with the military service <br />people. : <br /> <br />Acting Chairm'an I-~Iendriksen stated he is particularly interested in the last paragraph on the case <br />sheet with re,rd {to FAA rulings and questioned if this subject had been discussed with City <br />Attorney Bill ~oodrich. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik replied ;that she had not discussed this with Mr. Goodrich, however, what she learned <br />from the FCCliHeadquarters was that the judges will generally adhere to any ruling by a Federal <br />Commission;. iShe =lso stared that the City would process ali requests as a conditional use permit. <br />She called atte~tiori to the survey she conducted with neighboring cities and listed the following: <br /> <br />Anoka:, <br /> <br />Andover: <br /> <br />Chamglin: <br /> <br />No codes in place regarding towers and antennas; all requests are processed <br />as conditional use permits. <br /> <br />Height restriction of 35 feet; to exceed that requires a special use permit. <br /> <br />Height restriction of 60 feet; to exceed that requires a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Planning & <br /> <br />Zoning/December 4, 1990 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.