02/05/91 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Zoning Admi~str~tor Frolik included in her background that the property is adjacent to a single family urban r~de~mal area. Mr. Raudio showed the Commission a map of the subject property and surrounding area. A discussion erisue~l regarding rezoning, park dedication, the busy highway near the property, and what ,uses possibly: would and would not be acceptable to the neighboring residents (multiple famil) homeS, ~ondominiums, a business park). Mr. Raudio :t~en r, eferenced to outlots in the Flintwood PUD for which he is considering development:i~ thelnear future Mr. Raudio stated that when the Flintwood PUD received concept approval, it Was intended that the lots would be developed with quad lots. Ms. Frolik st.a~d that the quad lots may have been approved at the concept stage, but Flintwood received fina! l$,lat a~proval and was recommended at the County with the subject area designated by outlots. T~ no~ develop an outlot would require processing through the regular platting procedures. : .! Chairman Zin~merynan asked Mr. Raudio if he has plans showing the outlot subdivided into individual parcels t6 which Mr. Raudio replied that he did. Ms. tXrolik stated th,at those were preliminary plans, not what was finally approved and recorded. City Engineer ~lank4owski reiterated that the platting process would have to be followed to plat the outlot into par '~ e.~els. Commissioner~eerner stated he disagreed that Mr. Raudio would have to start at the beginning of the platting pr0~edUre. The Commission directed City Staff to bring forth a case file for Flintwood PUD to the next Commission m, eeti~, g for review. Case #4: ;Request for Reconsideration of Grading and Mining Plan; Case of i~e0ffrey Bridwell City Engineer)Jan~kowski explained that on December 4th, Mr. Bridwell appeared before the Planning and ~onir~g Commission to ask for a recommendation to approve a grading permit and at that meeting, t,$ere [were concerns over the final grade. Mr. Bridwell instructed his surveyor to show no more~ithan a 12% slope on the grading plans and Mr. Jankowsk~ submitted them to Council. Sotn~ po3tions of the plans exceeded 12% and represented 17% slopes which currently exist on the p~perty. Mr. Jankowski stated he could see a problem with a 3 to 1 slope due to it not being mp~abli~, but he feels 4 to 1 and 5 to 1 slopes are acceptable and represent what currently exist~ on ihe property. CommissioneVJDe0~mer stated that althouah 12% slopes are required by City Code, he finds Mr Bndwell s plla~s ac~geptable. He also stated that ~f the penn~t is denied, a 20% slope is what would be the end result arfyway as that is what currently exists on the propert.~'. Motion by C~mmissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Bawden to request Mr. Bridwell to sUl3mit~for the City Engineer's approval revised ~adin~ plans that limit the excavation operations to 3: to 1r slopes and finished gades to 5 to 1 slop~. Motion carri 7e~t. Hendriksen, Terry AZoting Yes: ~.nd Thorud. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner LaDue planning and Zoning Commission/January 2, i991 Page 5 of 6 Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Deemer, Bawden,