02/05/91 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

November 8, 1~90 ~nd will then proceed to City Council for final plat approval. Commissioner ~Deefl~er noted that the resubdivision of Lot 1, Block 1 will result in one of the lots having an accessory structure on it prior to any construction of a principal structure. City Code reqmres that no accessory structure shall be constructed on a lot prior to the pnnc~pal structure. The CommissiOn proceeded to review the City Engineer's report dated November 1, 1990. It was noted that there, waS a typographical error in the City Engineer's report and that the property to the north of the sUl~ject'is subdivision is zoned B 1 Business. Motion by Co~mi.qsioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to approve the sketch plan and recoriam~d City Council final plat approval of Jenson Addition contingent upon compliance with the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation for park dedication and sansfactory reviews:from DNR, EQB and Metro Council. Further Discussion. It was noted that this recommendation for approval is granting a variance for the accessory sWuctUre to be located ol] a lot without a principal structure. Motion carried. V~oting Yes: Vice-Cha'irman Hendriksen, Commissioners LaDue, Bawden, Deemer, Terry l~nd Thorud. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairman Zimmerman. Case # 2: ~eoUest for Sile Plan Review: Case Of Jim Charest, Eean Oil Co. Mr. Jim Chare~t, r~,presenting Egan Oil Company, was present requesting site plan review to construct a 4i000 square foot Cold storage warehouse on Lot 3, Block 2 Hi-Ten Ramsey. Mr. Charest noted' ~at even after the warehouse is constructed, there will still be some exterior storage on the site. The CommissiOn proceeded to review the City Engineer's report dated October 31, 1990. It was noted that Item #6'of the City Engineer's report contained some suggestions for revising the building and adcesa layout. It was determined that these suggestions do not coincide with the apphcant s progosed use for the building and that the applicant would not be obligated to comply with those suggestions. Mr. Charest w~/s agreeable to revising his plans to provide concrete curbing versus bituminous curbing. The possibility of regtuiring additional screening adjacent to Armstrong Boulevard was discussed to screen the use from traffic on Armstrong Boulevard and from B1 business uses to the east of Armstrong Bodlevard. It was also the consensus of the Commission that the plantings along Armstrong Boulevard could be of smaller size and it would still provide some assurance to the City that there will e~entually be adequate screening on that property as those plantings ~ow. Throu_h.~ discussion,, ~ it. was noted that Mr. Charest s en~ineerina firm had drawn up the drmna~e' plans incorrectly, and ~t was agreed that those plans would be corrected and submitted to the C~y and would be st!bject to the approval of the City Engineer. Motion by Co~ssioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Ten3' to recommend that City Council appr0v~ Jim Charest's request for site plan approval for a cold storage warehouse in Hi- Ten Ramsey cqntingent upon City Engineer approval of the revised landscaping plan and the revised drainage plan. PLANNING AND ZONING- COMMISSION/NOVEMBER 7, 1990 Page 5 of 10