My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/18/87 Public Hearing
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Airport Commission
>
Minutes
>
1987
>
03/18/87 Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 9:41:56 AM
Creation date
2/24/2004 8:12:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Airport Commission - Public Hearing
Document Date
03/18/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Patrick Kenned~ <br />7231 15]_~t Avel~ue NW <br /> <br />March ]_9', 1987 ~' <br /> <br />RE; Gateway i~dustrial North Airport Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />City off Ramse~ ..~ <br />Zoning Board/'O~ty Oouncil <br /> <br />I have attend~ your meetings, and studied your proposed airport plans~ and I feel <br />it is prematu~% to: begin a zonSng ordinance, as the entire plan is no~ a <br /> <br />i~]verythSn~ abO~t t~is plan is either "minimum" or just enough to get by, and Ramsey <br />deserw~s the ~st.~ (landfill proximity, Highway and railroad safety, residential <br /> ~for~ the people of R~nsey, etc.) <br />safety, regard ~ <br /> <br />On the South a~d o~ proposed runway, you plan for the Air corridore to cross over <br />Burlin~ton No~herh Railroad Mainline Track at an elevation of 22 feet~ or is it <br />2~ feet?~ aboFd To~ of Rail. The State of Minnesota Statutory Vertical Clearance <br />minimum i~ 22 ~eet~ above Top of Rail to Obstruction., for General~ thru Bridges~ <br />Highway ~ridg~, T~nnels, and through Buildings and Doors. These are "Fixed Ob- <br />structions'. ~ .~ <br /> <br />I'm wondcrir~g ~f someone mistook Statutory Vertical Clearance for "Fixed Obstruct- <br />ions" bo mean~ :~or ~nclude Airport Corridors~ <br /> <br />Burlington No~her~ operates Double-track Mainlines from Fridley Northtown Yard~ <br />to the West co~st~'~ and transports a multitude of Hazardous placarded~ and Flammable <br />placarded c;~r~ as~ well as other dangerous commodities. Statutory clearance is <br />~inimum cleara~ce,~ but not to be confused with the other requirements your airpot <br />must meet unde~ var~.ous Government Agency to safely operate near these nazards~ <br /> <br />~, logical ex~91e Would be the same as if your Airport were operating over an in- <br />dustry with haSard~us wastes, and or materials~ or toxic chemicals~ How high would <br />your corridor~nee~ to be~ to safely operate over them~~ What then is the closest <br />you can fly o~r ~ e s~ae substance, moving 60 MPH~ over top of Railroad Cars. (not <br />· top of rail~ a~ used for clearance~ I already know that I am right on this~) <br /> <br />If Lhe C~.ty ofjR~ey doesn't care to notice this error, and continues to attemt <br />zoning~ and b~g th~s Airport in the present unsafe plan, I feel compelled to <br />notify the pr~o~er ~gencys ~d enforcement, to protec~ my personal interests~ and <br />~;hose of the rSsi~nts of this community. <br /> <br />To try to cor:rect ~this error later, would mean at a 40;1 corridore ratio~ that <br />for every foot ~yo~[ must raise the corridore~ you will need to move 40 feet North~ <br />a.aa mf ~or e~ple~ Gust ~0 more feet clear.nee are-requzrea~ tn.e Alrport would <br />need to shif~ i,2~ feet addit~.onally. Zone A would be exte~ded~ more property <br />woul0 need ~m be ~ought , County Road 56 wouldn't have proper overhead clearance~ <br />ant. would prob~bl~ need to be moved West~ to obtain clearance. Most importantly <br />~he residents Of ~amsey ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ '~ <br /> ~ould ce o uuck wroth ~he aaaed <br /> <br />~for t~.(~ (;:%_ty :C~uncil to get off the hook~ they can place the airport issue before <br />the '~:,ople o~:~ ~ B~llot. (The Fair way, the Democratic way~) If the, people through <br />petition havc~_ ~'o 4b this, the City Council will be identified as no~ being capable <br /> use good ju~geraent. The City Council should Be ~penaing their time protecting <br />~ ts resident~~ ~ro~ such ill-pl~ned, ill-conceived plans. <br />Sincerely, ~ .~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.