My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/18/87 Public Hearing
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Airport Commission
>
Minutes
>
1987
>
03/18/87 Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 9:41:56 AM
Creation date
2/24/2004 8:12:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Airport Commission - Public Hearing
Document Date
03/18/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 13, 1987 <br /> <br /> THE CITY COUNI2II~ OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />RE: PUBLIC HE~R:[NG ON THE ZONING OF GATEWAY NORTH AIRPORT. <br /> <br />To Whom It May Condern: .......... <br />It seems doubtless to me%that I need to state my support for the airport <br /> <br />zoning for it t,° b~ made law. I am sure that if I made no objections <br />to it,as did hundreds of affected people, that informed council that <br />runs our city fo,r ~s)will pass it into law. That is exactly what I <br />want) and I thin~i that is what most everyone at the public hearing wants. <br />What I heard at ~th~ hearing was questions from people wondering how to <br />deal with the erain~nt changes caused by the new airport. For instance, <br />the people from .the Tom Thumb store seemed satisfied to have a forum <br />to say they woutd ~ather not mov% but to have things stay as they are. <br />A few other people ?ommented on property values lowing. When property <br />values don't drop but rather rise because of a better land use they'll <br />be happy. <br /> <br /> had talked tO ;!12 ihomeowners the 2 nights before the hearing. What I <br />found was everYOne[ ' <br /> [sa].d they were for the airport as proposed. They all <br />said that they w~ere frustrated with people proposing changes in their <br />lives. They werO a~l willing to have the changes happen but they refused <br />to jump for joY i~ov~r them. These homeowners in the "A,B C areas also <br />held the sentiment ithat the "squeeky wheel" gets greased. In reference <br />to the phrase, :One iman who stood up and expressed opposition to the <br />zonin% publlcl~la~er told me in private that he was for the new airport. <br /> <br />I have a business r~ext to the airport and a farm and home next to the <br />landfill. I wan~ ther airport for what it will do for the real estate <br />value of the la~d ~ext to it~and for the zoning which Will not allow <br />obnoxious uses~ and i low tax uses 'of property like an expanded landfill <br />or an asphalt ~an~)and.~ the extra truck traffic that would bring~that <br />I find obtrusive. Thank you. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.