Laserfiche WebLink
C~SE #11: <br /> <br />Your~ &cti~n will be to approve/disapprove of adopting the proposed <br />resolution. 7he following proposed motion is hereby submitted for <br />your ~on~ideration: <br /> <br /> Moti..on by __ and seconded by .... to adopt <br /> Re~lution ~85-=~= receiving the feasibii~ty stu~ for trunk <br /> ~ ~to~ s~er - west drainage district. Please refer to resolu- <br /> ~io~ file for Resolution ~85-__. <br /> <br /> ~cil discussion: <br /> ~t~On ~rrie~failed. Voting yes: Voting ~: <br /> Abs~ining: Absent: <br /> [ <br /> <br /> · <br /> <br />As YO~ know, at a recent meeting ~e Personnel Committee members <br />suggested that Mr. Lester Wirz be given additional compensation <br />~e ~f his ~king on all of ~e duties of ~e building ins~ction <br />~r~eht as well as assessing. At ~is meeting, the Personnel <br />~i~te~ will have a re~endation to you as to how they feel the <br />~1 ~ho~d pro~ on ~is matter. <br /> <br />~l ~R,viaw of Council Action on O~tober 8. 1985 Rela~nq ~o <br /> <br />~e~un~il will recall ~at on ~to~r 8, 1985, a motion was ~ssed <br />dir~tin~ ~e Ci~ Attorn~ to review Ci~ employee utilization of <br />Ci~ ~ime for o~er endeavors (i.e., as it ~rtains to Mr. Clayton <br />Ber~ 9nd~Ms. Sheila B~er) and to r~uest ~at Mr. Berg ~ present at <br />~e~to~r 28~ ~uncil ~eting. S~s~uent to ~at ~tion ~ssing, <br />~e ~At~rney discussed ~e ~tter with the Personnel Committee <br />on ~to~r 25, 1985. ~e ~r~nnel ~mmittee at that time ~ssed a <br />~t~o~ re~nding to the City Council ~at the City not proceed <br />with ~.the investigation because it would be of no benefit and to <br />re,end to ~e Ci~ ~uncil that for future pur~ses an explicit <br />~l!~ ~ est~lished stating ~at no Ci~ ~ployee is to ~nduct any <br />pri~ate business while ~ployed on behalf of ~e City of R~sey. <br /> <br />You~ action will ~ ~ ~nsider ~e ~rsonnel Committee recommenda- <br />tio~ ~d[to re, firm your October 8, 1985 original action on this <br />mat~, 9r ~ rescind ~at action or ~dify ~ you deem appropriate. <br />~e ~fOll~ing pro~sed motion is here~ s~itted for your considera- <br />tion: <br /> <br />Motion by ~ _ and seconded by ~ to reaffirm/ <br />~es¢lnd the Council action taken on October 8, 1985 directing <br />~heiCity Attorney to review City employee utilization of City <br />~im6 for other endeavors (i.e., as it pertains to Mr. Clayton <br />Berg and Ms. Sheila Beyer). <br /> <br /> <br />