My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/08/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/08/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:22:22 AM
Creation date
1/15/2015 12:12:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
01/08/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 14, 2014 Location: Fbrama>H.Drive>15153>RndingsI port <br />MEEIINGNOTES <br />This issue was not discussed at length; comments and questions were minimal, in comparison to other <br />issues outlined in this Rndingsfeport. The majority of discussion was centered on a potential <br />residential development, not the proposed data center development. <br />A number of questions were asked at this meeting. Follow up answers were provided via email, and are <br />included in the Findings/ port Appendix (dick here to view, page 11). <br />MIl1GAl1ON TECHNIQUES <br />If the Sibject Property is developed for a data center user, keep access to Nowt hen Boulevard to avoid <br />safety and congestion issues on existing residential roads. If the site is developed for residential, <br />provide the public an opportunity to discuss traffic impacts; and, identify mitigation techniques. <br />INPUT/ FEEDBACK(at meeting) <br />Generally, given the proposed access location and Engineer's traffic estimations, traffic was not a major <br />topic of discussion for the OMC 3udyG'oup. Acouple OMC3udyGroup members remain concerned <br />traffic generated by a data center traffic will be an issue for surrounding property owners. <br />One OMC.S*udy Group member is very concerned the Sibject Property may be developed for a <br />residential neighborhood. In which case, traffic would become a major issue on 152nd Avenue between <br />the Sibject Riopertyto Trunk Highway 47. If the Sabject R7opertyisdeveloped as residential <br />neighborhood, it has been requested the City allow the public an opportunity to discuss traffic concerns <br />further. <br />INPUT/ fBEDBACK(final meeting survey, quantitative) <br />Listed below are results from a survey/ poll conducted at the final OMC3udyGroup meeting. Eleven <br />(11) of the possible thirteen (13) CMC3`udy Group members eligible to vote participated. <br />Considering data center traffic concerns ONLY, please rate your <br />knowledge and understanding of this issue BEFORE the OM CStudy <br />Group process. <br />M I NI MAL (AVERAGE PERSON OFF THE STREET) <br />M ODBRATF1 FAI R(SJGHTLY M ORE THAN... <br />HI GH/ GOOD (CONFIDENT) <br />VER' HIGH (EXPERT) <br />3 <br />0 1 2 3 4 5 6 <br />OMC3udy Croup, Endings Report (DR4F7) Page 24 of 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.