My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 01/08/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2015
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 01/08/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 10:11:39 AM
Creation date
1/15/2015 12:32:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
01/08/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
considering two offers. General direction from the Council was to negotiate a Purchase Agreement with NIK <br />Management; and to bring it back in January 2015 for consideration. <br />Background (Land Use) <br />From a land use perspective, the proposed project is set for review by the Ramsey Planning Commission on 01/08 <br />(from a preliminary plan perspective). Results of said meeting will be disclosed during the presentation of this case; <br />or may be viewed online at QCTV.org. <br />Important Note on Access from County Road 5 <br />The existing access to the this site from Nowthen Boulevard will be a major topic to discuss/resolve before <br />the second proposed closing. The existing Nothewn Boulevard access is not owned by the City of Ramsey. <br />Said access has been granted via a temporary easement. When the old municipal center site develops, the <br />City will lose this temporary access easement. Therefore, the City needs to identify a solution to this problem. <br />Attached to this case are access alternatives. This item will be discussed at a January 08 public open house <br />and with the Planning Commission. Additionally, staff is working with affected property owners and Anoka <br />County to validate alternatives. With proper public input, Planning Commission input, property owner input, <br />and the feasibility of alternatives in -hand, Staff will bring this open item to the City Council for direction. <br />This item does not need to be resolved before signing this agreement. It will need to be resolved before the <br />second closing. <br />Notification: <br />NA <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations <br />Listed below are highlights of the proposed Purchase Agreement with NIK Management: <br />1. $929,000 total offer price ($41,500 per acre for phase one and $43,500 for phase two). NOTE: the total <br />listing price for this property was $860,000 ($40,000 per acre). <br />2. The proposed deal includes a two -phased closing (first closing on 14 acres in May of 2015 and second <br />closing on 7.5 acres in May of 2016). <br />3. The second closing requires the City to deliver a "construction -ready" site. Meaning, removal of existing <br />structures, improvements (parking, driveways, etc.), capping wells, removal of septic tanks (if needed), etc. <br />This work is estimated to cost the City about $150,000. <br />4. The second closing will require implementation of a "new/re-aligned" access to this site from Nowthen <br />Boulevard. This will affect the City's NET Proceeds. See background section of this case or item 7 below for <br />details. <br />5. $10,000 of earnest money will be put down on the project (1.07%). Earnest money is scheduled to be utilized <br />50% at closing one and 50% at closing two. <br />6. Major contingencies include site plan, plat, development agreement, and financing approvals before closing. <br />7. NET PROCEEDS: depending on several unknowns, City staff is estimating NET Proceeds ranging from <br />$236,887 to $511,887 for the proposed deal. Attached to this case is a feasibility analysis. NOTE: the City <br />may be able to significantly improve NET Proceeds by utilizing County HRA dollars to offset required City <br />redevelopment expenses. This item is discussed in the feasibility analysis. <br />Alternatives (recommend to the City Council) <br />Accept <br />Staff believes the proposed offer is fair for both parities and recommends the City Council consider accepting. The <br />proposed offer meets the City's asking sale price. The proposed terms and timelines are reasonable to staff, CBRE <br />and the City Attorney. The proposed project accomplishes multiple City goals: selling surplus city owned land, <br />getting tax-exempt land back on the tax -rolls, attaining land proceeds to help offset the cost of Fire Station #2, and <br />help perpetuate the initiative to relocate Fire Station #2. <br />Revise <br />The City Council may be interested in amending a number of terms included in this agreement before considering <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.