03/06/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

! ! CommissiOner ~Dgemer referred to Item #5 of the findings of fact and stated that the sohoo~ district projections for the PUD for kindergarten through 7th grade~are'90 children. ! ! Chairman Pmter$on brought up the subject of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Such a report Was done on Alpaca Estates because it was in the critical rivers area and ~QB required it. Mr. Carson requested preliminary approval of the PUD contingent upon the Environmental ASsessment Worksheet, if it is found to be required. Mr. Dunn aiso~pointed out that a State Disposal System Permit would be required if the pla~s are to drain into the Rum River and this may require an Environmental Assesseme~t WOrksheet. (Expansion of sewage collection systems in excess of 50,000 gallons/day would require an Environmental Assessment Worksheet) Mr. Rick Foster stated that this project will not generate 50,000 gallons/day. Commission '.cOnsensus is to recommend that Council order an Environmental Assessment ~Worksheet if it is determined by the City Engineer and City Attorney to be required. Mr. Carson lsta~ed that if the Environmental Worksheet is required, then it should be ~tat~d so in the PUD ordinance. Mr. Dunn P~int~d out that it is possible for a PUD to contain only 10--15 homes, in ~hic~ case an Environmental Assessment Worksheet would not be required.. City Ordinances do not constantly repeat State and County rules. Mr. Berg noted, that the PUD ordinance does require that Planning and. Zoning suk~it a w~itt~n statement to Council regarding their decision. Commission. consensus is that the minutes of this meeting will serve as P & Z's written stat~ent to Council. Motion by Com~issioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Kennen to recommend preliminary air, royal of the proposed Planned Unit Development for Flintwood Hills based on~ the facts discussed in these minutes, developer's exhibit dated Jan~rY ~30, 1984 (restrictive covenance), City Engineer's Letter dated February 3~ 1984 and City Engineer's letter dated February 7, 1984. Further, that a var.~a~e be granted to the open space requirement on the basis of additionaii ri~ht-of-way received from the developer for the MSA street, prior park dedxcat~gn and contribution to City Public Works property. (Note: The Commi. ssio~ is approving the plan viewed February 7, 1984 and referred to as Flintwood ~ills II Exhibit A of the agenda). Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Deemer, Kennen, Zimmerman andlHendriksen. Voting No: None. Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Kennen to recommend approval o~ ~e rezoning of the following described property to a Planned Unit Development: That ~ar~ of the south half of the Southwest Quarter and of Government Lot 3, Section 25, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the plat of Flintwood Hills and lying westerly!of the centerline of State Highway #47 as now laid out and traVeled~ Except that part described as follows: P & Z/February 7, 1984 Page 6 of 9