04/03/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Chairman ~ete~son inquired if the open space requirement brought up at the last regUtar~ouncil meeting had been resolved. Mr. Schnelle replied that it has. Mayor Ga/nec commented that if there is future subdivision to the north of this plat, park land should be included to coincide with this P.U.D. Chairman Pete~son brought up the subject of junk cars and pets; a concern expressed at ~he last regular Council meeting also. Mr. Dick Carson stated that the Restrictive Convenants applies to single family dwell'~ngs and the Homeowner's Association will apply to cluster housing. Regardi~glpe~s, the developer feels that City ordinances would cover this issue; developer does not feel he can really restrict somebody from having a pet on hiS~property. CommissionerlDeemer suggested that the City Leash Law be incorporated into the Restrictive Covenants. Mr. Carson agreed that the City Leash Law could be included in the Pestrictive Covenants and Homeowner's Association. Mr. Carson then referred to junk cars and stated that the City also has an ordinance to deal with storage of junk cars. Mr. Berg stated that the City Ordinance limits the property owner to one unlicensed V~hicle. Mr. Carson proposed that the Homeowner's Association allow for no unlicensed vehicles. Chairman~Pet~rson referred to Item ~5 of the findings of fact found on page 5 of 9 in ~la~ning and Zoning minutes dated February 7, 1984 and stated one councilmembelr feels this point needs more consideration; that this PUD will create m~re work for City Staff. Mr. CarsOn replied that there is a 5% administrative fee being charged to the develOper and that should be ample. Mayor Ga~ec stated that in looking at the total picture, the cost of providing service to this area in comparison to the tax base it will bring in is zero. City A~Z~inistrator Schnelle and City Engineer Raatikka stated that they foresee no excessive cost burden to the City. Commissioner Deemer referred to the open space issue again and stated that there seems-to be some misconception between open space and park land. Open space refers to green area not covered by streets and houses and has nothing~to ~o with park land. The park land dedicated in this plat was slightly deficient, but that deficiency was overlooked in consideration of certain~things given to the City. Mr. Arthur Dunn - Inquired if the same policy would hold true for residents forced ~ntor subdividing when sewer and water comes to their neighborhood; would they be required to pay a park fee? P & Z/March 6, 1984 Page 4 of 10