My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/27/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council - 01/27/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:59:27 PM
Creation date
1/23/2015 8:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/27/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
734
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member LeTourneau noted the Council will be discussing in a Work Session planning for future <br />needs. <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama reviewed the second and third <br />items with the Commission as follows: <br />Item 2 — Business Retention & Expansion is about developing and maintaining relationships. <br />Putting together EDA events and going to network events. This is part of the EDA that most <br />people understand and expect of the Commission. <br />Item 3 — Future Business Park, there are a number of specific work items with deadlines and <br />completion times with some items that have phases. <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama suggested adding one item to <br />the list, which is RFQ that has been pushed out to Engineering Firms for cost analysis. He stated <br />staff needs to dive in and address the possible implications of nearby train tracks and if they <br />would hinder businesses from coming into Ramsey. <br />Acting Chairperson Skaff wondered if there was a way to do a seismic study on the implications <br />of train vibrations near the proposed business park. <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama stated this can be done if the <br />Commission and Council decide it is needed. <br />Member Williams thought it was important to find out first what the cost is and then what benefit <br />it would be for the City. <br />Member Riley stated a perspective user would probably want to do their own study so a study <br />done by the City may have limited value and not worth the time or money. He stated if the <br />prospect business is concerned about it, the business would probably want to move elsewhere. <br />Member Riley stated they are not trying to focus on warehouse businesses with very few jobs. <br />Member LeTourneau stated the City needs to balance this out, look at the market, at what is <br />needed, and what can be handled. <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama reviewed the fourth through <br />seventh items with the Commission as follows: <br />Item 4 — Old Municipal Center Redevelopment, they are looking to redevelop this parcel. <br />Asst. City Administrator/Economic Development Manager Brama did not think this needed to be <br />reviewed at this time. <br />Economic Development Authority/December 11, 2014 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.