Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />on anYlex~ansion to the South. Legislature just this session <br />allow~ u~ to get $.15/cubic yard and that will have a <br />signi~$ca~t bearing on how Council considers it. However, I <br />want tO make this certain -- Council has met approximately 15 <br />times~ 0n.~his particular subject and each time I have cautioned <br />them always, always the Conditional Use Permit is the number one <br />issue~herg, even though you enter into a contract. Very similar <br />to a p~rs~n wanting to buy a piece of property which is zoned <br />comme~ia~ and the purchase agreement is subject to the zoning. <br />Simil'ar t~ this situation, the applicant is trying to purchase <br />the subject property. However, they are not going to purchase <br />the property unless they get a Conditional Use Permit; a very <br />typic.a~ cpmmercial transaction. Council has been cautioned, <br />writtem a~d verbally each time we discussed this subject; we <br />are not s~lling a Conditional Use Permit -- that is a separate <br />subject, i You are talking about land use issues; you are not <br />beinglbo~ht off, you are not purchasing, you are not able to <br />sell ai COhditional Use Permit -- not withstanding the contract -- <br />two separate subjects. This fact has been very much foremost <br />in C~Unc~l's thinking. If Council denies this Conditional Use <br />Permit~., Dhere is no contract and they have no obligation to <br />go forward. <br /> <br />Natalie ~iaas - 7007 164th Avenue NW - I am the County Commissioner <br />fromlthisl district and have been blessed with two potential sites <br />in my !di~itrict and two current sites. I would like to stand <br />befo=el R~msey Council and Ramsey Planning Commission and respect- <br />fully ~re~uest that you deny the Special Use Permit. I have met <br />withlyou ion a number of occasions and I believe stated from the <br />on szght,i whether meetzng wzth the City of Anoka or the City of <br />RamseM, ~hat I opposed expansion of the landfill in any way. <br />We are i~to a process that has been set on us by the State <br />LegiSlatUre; I think we ought to let that process run it's due <br />courS~ ;I would like to correct the man from Barr Engineering <br />who s&zdithe County was drawing water samples; that is MPCA <br />draw$~g '~hose samples and they will be tested in the State Health <br />Department laboratories and we ought to have the results of those <br />testS/before we do anything else. In defense of Waste Management, <br />and IhaVe had 15 years to look at landfilling in Anoka County, <br />if Iihad~to do business with somebody in the landfilling business, <br />I woui%d Sather do business with Waste Management than any other <br />company ~oing business in Anoka County. If you take a look at <br />what is '~appening in Andover and the kind of costs that we are <br />talking i~bout there, there was a special use permit involved <br />in that and no one has yet pointed a finger at the City of <br /> Ramsey o~ pointed a finger at the County and made us in any way <br /> responsible monetarily. .The dollars are going to come from some <br /> placelelSe; that is not $200,000 that has been spent by the City <br /> of Annoyer; that is being spent out of the Super Fund dollars. <br /> One t~ing I am sure about is that there is money in landfilling <br /> if we,do!it the way we are doing it today. I really do think that <br /> Wast~iMa~agement of Minnesota, in terms of the kinds of dollars <br /> theylhaV~ taken out of the City of Ramsey and Anoka, could well <br /> affor~ t~ commit dollars from their parent company, right now to <br /> take Som~ protection if that is the thing that is needed out here. <br /> In te,,rmsiof Site P, in order to develop Site P the way that it <br /> wOuldi'ha~e to be constructed under current legislation, the <br /> <br />Council/P & Z <br />Public Hearing <br />Page 20 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />