Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mayor ~m~ec !stated that as a result of Ms. Dickman not being present at two <br />previo~Co~cil meetings, regarding this same subject, a letter was sent to <br />her s~t~ngilthat if she was not present at this meeting, her request would be <br />con_ i r a <br /> <br /> [ <br />City A~t0rne, y Goodrich stated that Council should take action on Ms. Dickman's <br />request ~ve~ though she is not present. <br /> <br />Mayor ~. ~a~ec!noted that Planning and Zoning has recommended denial of Ms. Dickmaa's <br />request based on the results of their public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion i~b~ C~ncilme~ber Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Schlueter to <br />adopt ~h..~ f$ndings of fact of Ms. Darlene Dickman for a conditional use permit <br />to ope$~te 9 counseling service by appointment only at her residence located <br />at 845iI i'- l~6th Circle NW. <br /> <br />Motion l~rr~ed. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, councilmembers Sorteberg, Reimann, <br />Schluete~ ~d Van Wagner. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion bY C~uncilmember Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Schlueter to <br />disapP~e ~f MS. Darlene Dickman's request for a conditional use permit to <br />operate ~ c,6unseling service for out-patients at her residence located at <br />8451 -~ I66t~ Circle NW based on the findings of fact. <br /> <br />Motlon:Carrzed. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Reimann, <br />Schluet~r a~d Van Wagner. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #~.~ F~intwood Hills Second Addition P.U.D. Requiri.n~ Council Action <br />~. :: (~. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW); B. Final Approval <br />. : O~ Flintwood Hills Second Addition P.U.D.; C. A~r.oval Of Rezonin~; <br />: / D~~. A~roval Of Plans And Specifications And Orderin~ Pro~ect): <br /> <br />City E~gine~r Raatikka stated USGS surveyed and they do not see a problem with <br />the we i. I <br /> <br />Counci~l~e~r Schlueter referred to the EAW findings of fact and inquired if it <br />is Pro~en ~at after dewatering for the pipe, groundwater levels come back. <br /> ', <br /> <br />City ~Engin~er Raatikka replied that normally they do come back to their original <br />elevation, i <br /> <br /> [ <br />Counci~l~em~e~ r Schlueter inquired if an EAW was done on Ramsey's second <br />conneOt!on ~ <br /> <br />City ~n~inger Raatikka stated that the second connection is the metro line <br />coming ~ro~ Anoka to Ramsey's border and it is a major project which has <br />over §0~006 gallons of flow and PCA requires an EAW and that EAW is in progress. <br />Fina1 a~ti~n on that EAW should come the end of July, 1984. <br /> <br />Counc£1~em~r Schlueter inquired how that EAW would affect any decision Council <br />makes toni~ht. <br /> <br /> City ~in~er Raatikka stated that as far as extensions are concerned, that <br /> EAW h~aSi to ibe complete before PCA would give Ramsey or Waste Control a permit <br /> to ex~e~4 ~ewer. Final action has to take place on the EAW prior to any <br /> const~ti~n; plans and specs have to be prepared, developer has to post bond <br /> an~ ~Z' ~nto a developers contract. We are several months away from anything <br /> <br /> ~ , C/May 24, 1984 <br /> ~"i,~[.~L Paae 10 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />