Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />orderly and harmonious development of the city and the use <br />d~#tr ct wherein proposed. <br /> <br />No Co:~nission comment. <br /> <br />That :he use will not be substantially injurious to the <br />p~rmi ted uses nor unduly restrict the enjoyment of other <br />property in the immediate vicinity nor substantially diminish <br />and i'.npair property values within the area. <br /> <br />chairman Peterson stated that this item is closely related <br />to, It ~-m (f) of Standards for Considerations for which a <br />second appraisal has been requested to address. <br />Co~.mmi~sioner Deemer referred to Waste Management's letter of <br />July ~, 1984, point #4, regarding excessive odors due to <br />repairs to the migration control system and inquired if any <br />mO~e ~epairs are anticipated. <br /> <br />d) <br /> <br />Mr, 0 ter replied that the system is in good working order, <br />is mo~ itored continually and minor day to day repairs may <br />be ne :essary; no major repairs involving digging up several <br />hundr .~d feet of line is anticipated. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson inquired if some uncovering would be <br />in¥ol'~ed for the liner in the proposed expansion. <br /> <br />Mr* Otter replied that the liner over the North slope woUld <br />be:ovar soil material and cover would be removed only at the <br />very ~ottom. <br /> <br />That :he establishment of the use will not impede the <br />Order .y and normal development and improvement of the <br />surrounding property for uses permitted in the zoning <br />diBtrict. <br />No~ C°'_~mission comment. <br /> <br />e) <br /> <br />That ,adequate water supply and sewage disposal facilities <br />ar~ p_~ovided and in accordance with applicable standards. <br /> <br />Mr, G!oodrich stated that Ramsey currently does not have a <br />municlipal water supply and if Waste Management had a need <br />for ~ter supply there, and made application, they you <br />wo.Ulc~[ consider it. The same for sewage; if you find that <br />n, eed lis necessary by this proposal, then you have to say <br />they need it or they can't have that use. <br /> <br />Mr. Jfim O'Connor stated that Waste Management does not <br />enVisiion a need for sewer. The amount of leachate trucked <br />away feach day depends on the amount of rainfall and leachate <br />~ener~ated. A similar site in Wisconsin trucks away 2-3 <br />mitliion gallons of leachate per month. Waste Management <br />do!es~ot consider Ramsey's site, even with the expansion, <br />a la~,,ge enough facility to necessitate a trunk sewer system. <br /> <br /> [ <br /> <br />P & Z/July 3, ~ 84 <br /> Page 10 fo 19 <br /> <br /> <br />